Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
NYT Review of Drift by Rachel Maddow -- How War Came Home to Stay
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/29/books/drift-by-rachel-maddow-of-msnbc-traces-american-militarism.html?_r=1&pagewanted=printA squabble is a noisy quarrel over a trivial matter. A polemic is an aggressive attack on the opinions and principles of others. A screaming match is a contest in which contradictory points are stubbornly reiterated, with no regard for whatever else has been said. A political talk show is a gladiatorial contest in which squabbles, polemics and screaming matches are exploited for their entertainment value.
A book by the host of a political talk show is often an ancillary product or marketing tool. But Drift, by Rachel Maddow, whose show is on MSNBC, is much more. It is an argument a sustained, lucid case in which points are made logically and backed by evidence and reason. Whats more, it follows one main idea through nearly a half-century. The subtitle, The Unmooring of American Military Power, explains exactly what Drift is about.
Ms. Maddows point is that the way we go to war has changed: that there has been an expansion of presidential power, a corresponding collapse of Congressional backbone and a diminution of public attention. She does not see this in conspiratorial terms, but she has an explanation for the step-by-step way it evolved. She thinks the transformation began with a question asked by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 as he prepared to more than double the ground forces in Vietnam: You dont think I oughta have a joint session, do you? Did he need authorization from Congress, he asked the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, to make a troop deployment like that?
That very question indicates that Johnson understood the importance of Congressional authority. But it is Ms. Maddows contention that subsequent presidents have even more deliberately sought to avoid dragging Congress into the conversation, because Congressional debates and military allocations upset the public. So does the calling up of troops. As the waging of war has grown increasingly secretive and privatized, presidents have built on precedent. They have seen less and less advantage in letting Congress weigh in on these decisions.
A book by the host of a political talk show is often an ancillary product or marketing tool. But Drift, by Rachel Maddow, whose show is on MSNBC, is much more. It is an argument a sustained, lucid case in which points are made logically and backed by evidence and reason. Whats more, it follows one main idea through nearly a half-century. The subtitle, The Unmooring of American Military Power, explains exactly what Drift is about.
Ms. Maddows point is that the way we go to war has changed: that there has been an expansion of presidential power, a corresponding collapse of Congressional backbone and a diminution of public attention. She does not see this in conspiratorial terms, but she has an explanation for the step-by-step way it evolved. She thinks the transformation began with a question asked by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 as he prepared to more than double the ground forces in Vietnam: You dont think I oughta have a joint session, do you? Did he need authorization from Congress, he asked the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, to make a troop deployment like that?
That very question indicates that Johnson understood the importance of Congressional authority. But it is Ms. Maddows contention that subsequent presidents have even more deliberately sought to avoid dragging Congress into the conversation, because Congressional debates and military allocations upset the public. So does the calling up of troops. As the waging of war has grown increasingly secretive and privatized, presidents have built on precedent. They have seen less and less advantage in letting Congress weigh in on these decisions.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2812 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT Review of Drift by Rachel Maddow -- How War Came Home to Stay (Original Post)
kaitcat
Mar 2012
OP
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)1. kick
33Greeper
(188 posts)3. It's too bad...
...that the NY Times Book Reviewer didn't afford Rachel her proper title "Dr. Maddow".
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)4. Meh - She didn't publish it under that title...