Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Opinions: I worked in the Justice Department. I hope its lawyers won't give Trump an alibi.
This WaPo piece must be read by anyone whos counting on the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) to tell Trump the facts dont support a claim of national emergency at our southern border or a claim that more WALL would end some supposed immigration crisis
Link to tweet
Wow. Must-read piece, confirming everything career DOJ attorneys have been saying for the last 2 years.
Link to tweet
Opinions
I worked in the Justice Department. I hope its lawyers wont give Trump an alibi.
By Erica Newland
January 10 at 6:51 PM
Erica Newland is a counsel for the nonprofit group Protect Democracy and a former attorney adviser in the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel.
President Trump said Thursday that he will maybe definitely declare a national emergency to free up funds for his long-promised wall at the southern border. One reason for the presidents hesitation might be that he is awaiting word from the people who would be asked to give such a declaration the green light: Justice Department lawyers at the Office of Legal Counsel, or OLC, where I worked from August 2016 until I quit in mid-November.
Lawyers at OLC wear many hats, but their most significant role comes in advising the White House on the legality of proposed actions, including executive orders, proclamations and other presidential documents. .... When OLC approves orders such as the travel ban, it goes over the list of planned presidential actions with a fine-toothed comb, making sure that not a hair is out of line. It is this work that gives OLC its reputation as home to some of the federal governments finest attorneys. But when it comes to the presidents findings about the state of the world, OLC generally defers to the president.
This deference, which is baked into OLCs culture, proceeds from the assumption that the president is acting consistent with Article II of the Constitution and with his oath of office, both of which require that he faithfully execute the laws. That means he has a constitutional duty to act honestly and in the public interest. OLCs deference is also born of a recognition that its lawyers are not equipped to be sophisticated fact-finders.
But when I was at OLC, I saw again and again how the decision to trust the president failed the offices attorneys, the Justice Department and the American people. The failure took different forms. Sometimes, we just wouldnt look that closely at the claims the president was making about the state of the world. When we did look closely, we could give only nudges. For example, if I identified a claim by the president that was provably false, I would ask the White House to supply a fig leaf of supporting evidence. Or if the White Houses justification for taking an action reeked of unconstitutional animus, I would suggest a less pungent framing or better tailoring of the actions described in the order.
....
Eventually, I decided that the responsibilities entailed in my oath were incompatible with the expectations of my job. If my former colleagues at OLC, and throughout the Justice Department, are now working on the possible declaration of a national emergency, I dearly hope they are as meticulous in their review of the presidents justifications as they are in their review of the actions he plans to take. And I hope, more than anything else, that they are asking themselves whether they, too, are just fashioning a pretext, building an alibi.
Read more:
Harry Litman: How the Supreme Court might rule if Trump declares an emergency for his wall
Jennifer Rubin: An emergency power grab would only add to Trumps problems
Henry Olsen: Trump is threatening to go around Congress to get his wall. History shows hell fail.
John Q. Barrett: How Congress can stop Trumps emergency
I worked in the Justice Department. I hope its lawyers wont give Trump an alibi.
By Erica Newland
January 10 at 6:51 PM
Erica Newland is a counsel for the nonprofit group Protect Democracy and a former attorney adviser in the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel.
President Trump said Thursday that he will maybe definitely declare a national emergency to free up funds for his long-promised wall at the southern border. One reason for the presidents hesitation might be that he is awaiting word from the people who would be asked to give such a declaration the green light: Justice Department lawyers at the Office of Legal Counsel, or OLC, where I worked from August 2016 until I quit in mid-November.
Lawyers at OLC wear many hats, but their most significant role comes in advising the White House on the legality of proposed actions, including executive orders, proclamations and other presidential documents. .... When OLC approves orders such as the travel ban, it goes over the list of planned presidential actions with a fine-toothed comb, making sure that not a hair is out of line. It is this work that gives OLC its reputation as home to some of the federal governments finest attorneys. But when it comes to the presidents findings about the state of the world, OLC generally defers to the president.
This deference, which is baked into OLCs culture, proceeds from the assumption that the president is acting consistent with Article II of the Constitution and with his oath of office, both of which require that he faithfully execute the laws. That means he has a constitutional duty to act honestly and in the public interest. OLCs deference is also born of a recognition that its lawyers are not equipped to be sophisticated fact-finders.
But when I was at OLC, I saw again and again how the decision to trust the president failed the offices attorneys, the Justice Department and the American people. The failure took different forms. Sometimes, we just wouldnt look that closely at the claims the president was making about the state of the world. When we did look closely, we could give only nudges. For example, if I identified a claim by the president that was provably false, I would ask the White House to supply a fig leaf of supporting evidence. Or if the White Houses justification for taking an action reeked of unconstitutional animus, I would suggest a less pungent framing or better tailoring of the actions described in the order.
....
Eventually, I decided that the responsibilities entailed in my oath were incompatible with the expectations of my job. If my former colleagues at OLC, and throughout the Justice Department, are now working on the possible declaration of a national emergency, I dearly hope they are as meticulous in their review of the presidents justifications as they are in their review of the actions he plans to take. And I hope, more than anything else, that they are asking themselves whether they, too, are just fashioning a pretext, building an alibi.
Read more:
Harry Litman: How the Supreme Court might rule if Trump declares an emergency for his wall
Jennifer Rubin: An emergency power grab would only add to Trumps problems
Henry Olsen: Trump is threatening to go around Congress to get his wall. History shows hell fail.
John Q. Barrett: How Congress can stop Trumps emergency
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1068 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinions: I worked in the Justice Department. I hope its lawyers won't give Trump an alibi. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jan 2019
OP
Roger Stone, creator of 'the wall' totem for traitortrump. Hmmmm? Mueller may be
empedocles
Jan 2019
#2
FM123
(10,053 posts)1. Wow, must read is right!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. Roger Stone, creator of 'the wall' totem for traitortrump. Hmmmm? Mueller may be
looking for maximum pressure on Stone, especially now? Absolutely hope so.
[Might explain why Stone not yet fully Muellered]
[Stone cite contained in above article by Litman]
dalton99a
(81,468 posts)3. Kick