Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Justices asked to enter abortion fray
SCOTUSblog Retweeted#SCOTUS docket indicates that Justice Samuel Alito has called for a response from the state in Louisiana abortion case, due on Thursday afternoon. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18a774.html
Link to tweet
Amy Howe Independent Contractor and Reporter
Posted Mon, January 28th, 2019 4:11 pm
Justices asked to enter abortion fray
The hot-button issue of abortion returned to the Supreme Court today. Two doctors who perform abortions and an abortion clinic asked the justices to block a lower-court ruling that upheld a Louisiana law that, according to a federal trial court, would leave only one physician providing abortion in the entire state. The challengers want the Supreme Court to put the lower courts decision on hold which would mean that the state could not enforce the law to give them time to file a petition for review; the justices ruling on todays request could tell us a lot more about how the Roberts Court, more conservative since the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy last year, might approach abortion cases going forward.
The case is a challenge to a Louisiana law that requires physicians who perform abortions in the state to have active admitting privileges the ability not only to admit patients, but also to provide diagnostic and surgical services at a hospital within 30 miles of the facility where the doctor provides abortions. In 2016, a divided eight-member Supreme Court struck down a similar law from Texas, which that state had argued was intended to protect the health of pregnant women. Justice Anthony Kennedy, who retired last year, joined the courts four more liberal justices in concluding that, although the state has a legitimate interest in protecting womens health, there was no evidence that the admitting-privileges requirement promoted that interest. On the other hand, the majority stressed, the admitting-privileges requirement made it much harder for women to obtain abortions.
Louisiana itself had described the admitting-privileges requirement as identical to the one struck down, and a federal district court declared the law unconstitutional, reasoning that the requirement does little or nothing for womens health but would cripple womens ability to have an abortion. In September 2018 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed, and 10 days ago the full 5th Circuit rejected the challengers request to rehear the case.
Today the challengers urged the justices to intervene and bar the state from enforcing the admitting-privileges requirement until the challengers can file (and the Supreme Court can rule on) a petition for review. They argue that the Supreme Court is likely to take up the case and reverse the 5th Circuits decision an important criterion for emergency relief because the law is virtually indistinguishable from the Texas one that the Supreme Court has already deemed unconstitutional.
....
This post was originally published at Howe on the Court.
Posted in June Medical Services, LLC v. Gee, Emergency appeals and applications to the Supreme Court, Featured, What's Happening Now
Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Justices asked to enter abortion fray, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 28, 2019, 4:11 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/justices-asked-to-enter-abortion-fray/
Posted Mon, January 28th, 2019 4:11 pm
Justices asked to enter abortion fray
The hot-button issue of abortion returned to the Supreme Court today. Two doctors who perform abortions and an abortion clinic asked the justices to block a lower-court ruling that upheld a Louisiana law that, according to a federal trial court, would leave only one physician providing abortion in the entire state. The challengers want the Supreme Court to put the lower courts decision on hold which would mean that the state could not enforce the law to give them time to file a petition for review; the justices ruling on todays request could tell us a lot more about how the Roberts Court, more conservative since the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy last year, might approach abortion cases going forward.
The case is a challenge to a Louisiana law that requires physicians who perform abortions in the state to have active admitting privileges the ability not only to admit patients, but also to provide diagnostic and surgical services at a hospital within 30 miles of the facility where the doctor provides abortions. In 2016, a divided eight-member Supreme Court struck down a similar law from Texas, which that state had argued was intended to protect the health of pregnant women. Justice Anthony Kennedy, who retired last year, joined the courts four more liberal justices in concluding that, although the state has a legitimate interest in protecting womens health, there was no evidence that the admitting-privileges requirement promoted that interest. On the other hand, the majority stressed, the admitting-privileges requirement made it much harder for women to obtain abortions.
Louisiana itself had described the admitting-privileges requirement as identical to the one struck down, and a federal district court declared the law unconstitutional, reasoning that the requirement does little or nothing for womens health but would cripple womens ability to have an abortion. In September 2018 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed, and 10 days ago the full 5th Circuit rejected the challengers request to rehear the case.
Today the challengers urged the justices to intervene and bar the state from enforcing the admitting-privileges requirement until the challengers can file (and the Supreme Court can rule on) a petition for review. They argue that the Supreme Court is likely to take up the case and reverse the 5th Circuits decision an important criterion for emergency relief because the law is virtually indistinguishable from the Texas one that the Supreme Court has already deemed unconstitutional.
....
This post was originally published at Howe on the Court.
Posted in June Medical Services, LLC v. Gee, Emergency appeals and applications to the Supreme Court, Featured, What's Happening Now
Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Justices asked to enter abortion fray, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 28, 2019, 4:11 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/justices-asked-to-enter-abortion-fray/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 819 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post