Two years in, Trump's appeals court confirmations are at a historic high point
The next time anyone asks, "why do Republicans put up with him?" this is the answer.
David Fahrenthold Retweeted
Two years in, Trumps appeals court confirmations are at a historic high point
Link to tweet
Two years in, Trumps appeals court confirmations at a historic high point
By Ann E. Marimow
February 4 at 6:30 AM
President Trump has installed a historic number of federal appeals court judges for this point of a presidency. ... But the immediate effect on the composition of the courts across the country is modest and the rapid pace is unlikely to continue because of a limited number of remaining open seats.
The Senate confirmation of Trumps 30 appeals court judges is more than any other presidents two years into a term. ... His picks for the nations 13 circuit courts, one step below the Supreme Court, predominantly are male and less diverse than those tapped by his predecessor.
They also include younger nominees, including a 36-year-old former clerk to Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch, which means Trumps conservative imprint on the federal judiciary will endure through cases involving state gun regulations, the environment, immigration and abortion.
....
....
....
Ann Marimow covers legal affairs for The Washington Post. She joined The Post in 2005 and has covered state government and politics in California, New Hampshire and Maryland. Follow https://twitter.com/amarimow
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Praying for a rich white conservative to win in 2016, so that they could vacancies he held for them, as he did for Gorsuch.
Might just be emphasis. If the pace is unlikely to continue, it's likely that he focused on filling those. He's way behind the average in appointing lower-ranking judges.
Might just be like looking at how one horse fares 1/2 of the way through a race versus another horse at the midway point in a different race. Some will be behind at the midpoint and pull ahead in the last half; some will be ahead at the halfway mark and then wind up trailing as they cross the finish line.
Every president of the last few end with a bunch of unfilled positions. Some's partisanship, some's just those that the Senate didn't want to confirm or didn't get around to. The rest of the bias is distribution.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)If the courts lose integrity....... BAD news...
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)who despite knowing the stakes, decided to burn the whole world down rather than be pragmatic