Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Mon Jun 17, 2019, 12:40 PM Jun 2019

The danger of Tom Cotton

Source: Washington Post

The danger of Tom Cotton

By James Downie
Opinions editor
June 16 at 6:11 PM

Ask anyone in politics to describe Sen. Tom Cotton’s foreign policy, and the first word you hear is likely to be “hawkish.” Yet despite this well-deserved reputation, the Arkansas Republican has managed to surprise interviewers twice in recent weeks with just how welcoming he is of conflict.

On Sunday’s “Face the Nation,” Cotton followed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who forcefully argued that evidence proves Iran was behind Thursday’s attacks on two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. It should be noted that other countries such as Germany and Japan do not believe that the evidence released so far proves that Iran was behind the attacks. But overconfident predictions about intelligence have never backfired on the United States, aside from that one war about supposed weapons of mass destruction that dragged on for years with hundreds of thousands of deaths. Regardless, when host Margaret Brennan asked whether the president had the authority to strike Iran, Pompeo thankfully dismissed the idea, saying, “I don’t want to get into hypotheticals.”

Cotton took a different view:

Iran for 40 years has engaged in this kind of attacks, going back to the 1980s. In fact, Ronald Reagan had to re-flag a lot of vessels going through the Persian Gulf and ultimately take military action against Iran in 1988. These unprovoked attacks on commercial shipping warrant a retaliatory military strike.

Taken aback, Brennan asked, “Are you — you’re comparing the tanker war in the ’80s to now, and saying that that’s the kind of military response you want to see?” Cotton affirmed the comparison and his preferred response. He left out that the U.S. action under Reagan came after several years and hundreds of attacks on tankers by both sides of the Iran-Iraq War. The current situation is far calmer, yet Cotton is champing at the bit for another U.S. strike on a Middle Eastern country.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/06/16/danger-tom-cotton/
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The danger of Tom Cotton (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2019 OP
I've hated Cotton ever since he wrote Iran that letter saying not to listen to Obama. Shell_Seas Jun 2019 #1
+1 Docreed2003 Jun 2019 #3
+2! Rhiannon12866 Jun 2019 #6
"Warmonger" and "hawk" do not even begin to MBS Jun 2019 #2
Jesus still ain't comin', Tommie. czarjak Jun 2019 #4
Hate peddler. Karadeniz Jun 2019 #5

MBS

(9,688 posts)
2. "Warmonger" and "hawk" do not even begin to
Mon Jun 17, 2019, 01:16 PM
Jun 2019

. . .convey what a maniac this guy is. keep this guy away from any positions of power in DOD, the State Dept., and the White House. .. and keep him far, FAR away from nuclear codes.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The danger of Tom Cotton