A 7-year-old was ordered to leave a fountain because of her swimwear. Even she knew it was wrong.
A 7-year-old was ordered to leave a fountain because of her swimwear. Even she knew that it was all wrong.
When her mother prepared to write a complaint, the rising second grader drafted her own message
Theresa Vargas
June 27
In a drawing, the 7-year-old girl set the scene.
Starbucks sat in the background. Uneaten food rested on an outdoor table. And smack in the middle of the Downtown Silver Spring fountain, where the water spouted the highest, stood a boy in shorts and a Surfs Up shirt. Next to him, two girls in bathing suits played. All three wore smiles.
Off to the side stood another figure, a frowning yellow-haired girl in purple shorts and a matching shirt.
The 7-year-old circled the girl to indicate it was her.
A 7-year-old girl drew this the night she was ordered out of the Downtown Silver Spring fountain. (Roz Dzelzitis/Roz Dzelzitis)
What happened to the rising second-grader on a recent evening at the popular Maryland splash fountain has elicited outrage from some parents and raised important questions about the practices of privately owned, publicly used aquatic spaces where children spend their summers splashing and squealing.
What led to the incident is complicated, but this much remains undisputed: The girl was singled out because of what she was wearing.
....
At one point, she said, her daughter walked over to them and pointed at a boy in the fountain. ... She said, But look, that boy over there is wearing swim shorts and Im wearing swim shorts,? Dzelzitis said. ... He said, But thats a boy and youre a girl.?
....
This piece originally appeared in The Washington Post.
Theresa Vargas is a columnist for The Washington Post. Before that, she worked on the local enterprise team.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Good golly, she's seven years old. What was the concern here?
Have people lost all common sense?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,489 posts)This is a trick question, right?
GB_RN
(2,356 posts)After all, "common sense" is a total misnomer, there's not one damned thing that's common about it.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)is simply the prejudice I prefer
Igel
(35,320 posts)Are they short pants that boys swim in, or the "swimming shorts" that is a synonym for "non-spandex men's swim wear".
I've been in places where cut-offs or street shorts were verboten, but swimming shorts were okay. Because one's not swimwear and the other is. It's a fine line, but in some places it's enforced as best they can. That's not to say that it's not violated, but in my experience when it's pointed out that the "swimming shorts" some kid's wearing are really just street shorts the kid's been ejected.
Perhaps this place is different and is discriminating. I just can't tell from what's presented. "Swim shorts" is used too ambiguously by a 7-year-old girl (most kids that aren't aren't noted for their extreme linguistic precision, to be honest).
(Do they make swimming shorts for girls? Not a part of the store I need to pay attention to.)
JI7
(89,252 posts)they didn't say the difference was type of shorts
flying_wahini
(6,606 posts)Too many damn rules. Some people just have to squish ALL the fun out of everything!