Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dulcinea

(6,642 posts)
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 07:37 AM Jul 2019

Fear And Loathing At The Supreme Court -- What Is Chief Justice John Roberts Up To?

What was he thinking? That is the question many are asking on both sides of the political spectrum.

Chief Justice John Roberts repeatedly voted with the Supreme Court's conservatives this term, except in one, and only one, 5-to-4 decision. Written by Roberts, the ruling blocked the addition of a citizenship question on the 2020 census, leaving an angry President Trump desperately trying to find a way around it.

It also left a lot of speculation about the motives of the chief justice.

For some conservatives, Roberts' vote in the census case was another original sin, much like his vote in 2012 to uphold key provisions of Obamacare. The chairman of the American Conservative Union has even called for Roberts' impeachment.

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/08/738930098/fear-and-loathing-at-the-supreme-court-what-is-chief-justice-john-roberts-up-to

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fear And Loathing At The Supreme Court -- What Is Chief Justice John Roberts Up To? (Original Post) Dulcinea Jul 2019 OP
Roberts is concerned about optics. shanny Jul 2019 #1
You are right on the money rurallib Jul 2019 #2
 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
1. Roberts is concerned about optics.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 07:50 AM
Jul 2019

While he is as much an ideologue as his fellow conservatives, he doesn't want to be seen as one.

He wanted to overturn the ACA but couldn't do it clean: it was written as a tax and Congress has that power. So he upheld it WITH the poison pill of optional Medicaid expansion (his own insertion in a concurring opinion).

The citizenship question was on equally shaky legal ground. That didn't bother the rest of the cons but, again, optics. Roberts didn't issue a clear refusal; instead he sent it back for a do-over.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Fear And Loathing At The ...