GREEN: Los Angeles, Known For Freeways, To Plant A Ton- 90,000- TREES With 1st Forest Officer
'Los Angeles, a City Known for Its Freeways, Is About to Plant a Shit Ton of Trees.' The effort starts with its first-ever forest officer. By Jackie Mogensen, Mother Jones, Oct. 3, 2019.
Los Angeles, the sprawling city of freeways, thinks its future depends on trees. And it may be right: Research shows trees improve air and water quality, store carbon, and can even reduce stress. All these benefits dont seem to be lost on Mayor Eric Garcetti, who in late April announced his version of a Green New Deal for the city. Among other measures, he mandated that every new city-owned building be all-electric, established a goal to phase out styrofoam, called for a 50 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025, and, crucially, tasked the city with the goal of planting a whopping 90,000 trees by the end of 2021.
-- With flames on our hillsides and floods in our streets, Garcetti said in a press release at the time, cities cannot wait another moment to confront the climate crisis with everything weve got.
The ambitious tree-planting project falls under the purview of Rachel Malarich, the citys forest officera job that was just created in August to oversee the growth of Los Angeles urban forest as part of Garcettis Green New Deal. An arborist with more than a decade of experience in urban forestry, Malarich was appointed just days before the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a report that emphasized the role of trees and forests in combatting climate change. The project will grow whats already the largest urban forest in the country, making what happens in Los Angeles an important model for other cities looking to go green.
A real tree nerd myself, I called Malarich last month, when she was just a few weeks into the job, to chat about the unnoticed benefits of urban foliage, which species is her favorite, and the challenges of actually planting tens of thousands of trees in just a few years. Below is an edited and condensed version of our conversation...
What kinds of things do you deal with now or do you expect to deal with? I dont think Im down into a routine yet. In this initial time, Im meeting key stakeholders, including heads of departments and council offices and kind of doing the rounds of doing introductions. Im also doing some background research. But I dont know yet, honestly [laughs]. Im still finding out where to get paper and pens.
Im trying to wrap my head around this goal of 90,000 new trees by 2021. It would require planting, on average, almost 100 trees per day [beginning in April 2019]. How is that going to be possible?..
The truth is, we dont plant if at all possible between say, June and September. Its too hot for people to plant, so that limits more the time in which were planting. But the reason its totally feasible and I feel real confident is, it isnt just the city whos planting. There are more than five nonprofits that plant trees in Los Angeles and do fundraising and community organizing around that. And they work very, very closely with the city and with each other to plant trees. Theres definitely a portion of this goal thats going to be me doing some very strategic planning and grant writing and engaging our community groups and partners to help us reach this aspirational goal. But its doable. We have the partnerships and expertise in place to do it.
Are there areas or neighborhoods that you plan to focus on? Obviously, higher-need neighborhoods. We have areas around the Port of LA that have low canopy cover. We have portions of the San Fernando Valley which are extremely hot and could use some additional shade. And portions of South and East LA that also have tremendous opportunity to get additional canopy and are under different environmental and social burdens.
Are there some benefits of urban trees that you think most people dont realize? Trees help us capture stormwater. They slow down rain when it falls from the sky, which is a huge deal here in Los Angeles, with our storm events, to be able to capture some of that water. [Water] droplets collect on the leaves and then run down the branches and have time to soak into the ground rather than just hitting the pavement and rolling away...Read More...
~ "I was in Washington, DC, on a trip and walked through a city street and then walked through part of the National Mall that had tree cover. And it was so dramatically cooler."
~ "I think that trees are a really important part of our communities, and they are hugely connected to public health."
More, https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2019/10/los-angeles-green-new-deal-forest-officer/
Downtown Los Angeles.
#theforgottensolution TREES & FORESTS, Alec Baldwin & Jane Goodall.
- Danes Raise Millions of Euros To Plant Trees In First-Ever Climate Telethon, Sept.15, 2019
https://www.dw.com/en/danes-raise-millions-of-euros-in-first-ever-climate-telethon/a-50436163
NNadir
(33,525 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)If they do the responsible thing and plant native trees, maybe theres a chance- ?
Mosby
(16,319 posts)appalachiablue
(41,144 posts)'American Cities Lose 36 Million Trees a Year. But Theres a Radical New Plan to Save Them.' Mother Jones, 2018.
The evidence is in: Urban trees improve air and water quality, reduce energy costs, and improve human health, even as they offer the benefit of storing carbon. And in cities across the country, they are disappearing.
A recent paper by two US Forest Service scientists reported that metropolitan areas in the US are losing about 36 million trees each year. The paper, by David Nowak and Eric Greenfield, was an expansion of the same researchers 2012 study that found significant tree loss in 17 out of the 20 US cities studied.
This arboreal decline is happening even in some areas that promote million-tree campaigns, Arbor Day plantings, and street-tree giveaways. Cash-strapped municipalities just cant find enough green to maintain the green. Additionally, many cities are adjusting to population booms, and to temperature increases and drought due to climate changeboth conditions that can be hard on trees (while increasing their value as sources of cooling and cleaner air). Theres also a growing recognition of the inequity of tree-canopy distribution in many cities, with lush cover in wealthy neighborhoods and far fewer trees in disadvantaged areas...
More, https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2018/09/american-cities-lose-36-million-trees-a-year-but-theres-a-radical-new-plan-to-save-them/
Seattle park.
love_katz
(2,580 posts)Like other posters, I wonder where they will get enough water to make the project successful. I haven't visited L.A. since about the 1970's, but I remember it as appearing to be a brown dried out desert. I know that when trees are first planted, that they need a lot of water to survive, let alone thrive. Maybe they can invest in some help from people with training in Permaculture? Because it would be nice to see their project succeed. Here in Cascadia, I planted two cedar trees in my parking strip. One lived, but the other died. We had two really hot summers in a row, which were part of what killed one of the trees. The other factor was that the surviving tree is shaded by my house and a walnut tree that the squirrels planted. Both cedar trees received water via a deep watering strategy that was recommended by our city forrester. The deciding factor for survival was the shade during the hottest part of the afternoon.
corbettkroehler
(1,898 posts)This vital aspect often is overlooked. I hope that the new staffer in charge of the initiative has a plan.