Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,489 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 12:53 PM Oct 2019

Jennifer Rubin: Trump should be very worried about Senate Republicans

Opinions
Trump should be very worried about Senate Republicans

By Jennifer Rubin, Opinion writer
Oct. 25, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. EDT

Think of Senate Republicans’ current antics protesting “secret” House hearings on impeachment — in which Republicans sit on the relevant committees — as not simply spurious (recall that Benghazi depositions were held by the House in private), but a warning sign to President Trump that his allies in the Senate seem altogether unwilling to defend him on the merits.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) pleads that he cannot comment on substance because he cannot separate that from the “unfairness" of the House process. (It’s fairly simple, honestly.) Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-La.) claims he cannot comment on testimony he hasn’t seen that Trump used taxpayer money (in the form of foreign aid) to extort the Ukrainian government to interfere in our election. The problem with that: The testimony, at least the opening statement from acting ambassador William B. Taylor Jr., was released publicly this week.

No senator is saying openly that the president’s conduct is not impeachable. No senator is saying the witnesses lack credibility. No senator is saying it is perfectly appropriate for the president to use his powers to aid his campaign effort. There is a reason for that stunning silence: There is every reason to view this conduct as unprecedented, impeachable and amply provable through multiple witnesses and documents.

The “unfairness” excuse to attack the House is also of very limited duration. Next month, the House case will be put on in public. What excuse will Republicans use then?
....
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jennifer Rubin: Trump should be very worried about Senate Republicans (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2019 OP
I wish she was right, but if history is any indication, she's not still_one Oct 2019 #1
She is correct that Senate Republicans are being very quiet for the most part. yellowcanine Oct 2019 #2
K&R for visibility crickets Oct 2019 #3
Reporters need to keep asking "Would you extort a foreign government for fake dirt on an opponent?" lagomorph777 Oct 2019 #4

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
2. She is correct that Senate Republicans are being very quiet for the most part.
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 11:02 AM
Oct 2019

Except for many of them signing on to Lindsey's nothing burger of a resolution.

Part of the reason for the quiet is that they do not want to say, "well, if this is proven, I would vote to convict." Because the truth is that most are terrified that many bad things are going to be proven and they want to reserve the out that, "well that is bad but it is not cause for impeachment and removal." However this only works if public opinion does not shift dramatically for impeachment AND removal, say - that number hits 60%. That is essentially what happened with Nixon and then Goldwater led the Republicans over to the WH to tell Nixon that Republican support in the Senate had collapsed and he would be removed if he did not resign first. The equivalent today would be for Mitt Romney to lead such a mission, which probably won't happen so it might be up to Mitch McConnell if it comes to that. I can see McConnell doing it if he became convinced that Republicans will lose everything in 2020 - House, Senate, and White House. We will see what the silence means. But silence is better than "We will not convict no matter what." Only Lindsey appears to be saying that and if I were Trump, I wouldn't put too much stock in it because Lindsey is a political weasel also and he will run and hide in the South Carolina swamps rather than risk so much as a scratch.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. Reporters need to keep asking "Would you extort a foreign government for fake dirt on an opponent?"
Thu Oct 31, 2019, 04:31 PM
Oct 2019

"If not, why not?"

Also, "If Obama had made this phone call, how would you react?"

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Jennifer Rubin: Trump sho...