Noam Chomsky, America Has Built A Global Dystopia
By Robert Sheer, Truthdig, Jan. 10, 2020, Excerpts, Ed: It is nearly impossible to live in todays world without having come across mention of the legendary Noam Chomsky. His work as a linguist, historian, political activist and philosopher, which spans nearly a century. While he and Robert Scheer, the renowned left-wing thinker and Truthdigs award-winning editor in chief, are both well known in progressive circles for their lifelong work challenging systems of oppression and false narratives about American exceptionalism, until now, the two had never had a public conversation.
In a remarkable two-part interview, Chomsky and Scheer meet to discuss topics ranging from the type of dystopian future we face to the unfortunate, brutal success of the U.S. empire. Basing his first question on Chomskys immense body of work, Scheer focuses on the well-known texts by Aldous Huxley and George OrwellBrave New World and 1984, positing that there is an amalgam of these two totalitarian, dystopian models emerging. I think we can start with the assumption [that] we have to be concerned about a dystopian future. Which model do you see emerging? Scheer asks. Chomsky offers a detailed response based on the novel We, by Yevgeny Zamyatin, and Shoshana Zuboffs The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, which, in his view, best predict and outline the techno-surveillance system that has already begun to take hold in the U.S. and beyond, as companies such as Google, Amazon and others find novel ways to exert control over humankind.
The kind of model toward which society is moving is already illustrated to a substantial extent in China, where they have very heavy surveillance systems and
what they call a social credit system, Chomsky says. You get a certain number of points, and if you, say, jaywalk, violate a traffic rule, you lose points. If you help an old lady across the street, you gain points. Pretty soon, all this gets internalized, and your life is dedicated to making sure you follow the rules that are established. This is going to expand enormously as we move to whats called the internet of things, meaning every device around youyour refrigerator, your toothbrush and so onis picking up information about what youre doing, predicting what youre going to do next, trying to control what youre going to do next, advise what you do next.
Perhaps most alarmingly, Chomsky asserts that Huxley was kind of right in positing that people may not see [this form of surveillance] as intrusive; they just see it as thats the way life is, the way the sun rises in the morning.
In perhaps the most harrowing portion of the interview, Scheer asks Chomsky a question on many peoples minds nowadays as a variety of human caused factors threaten humanitys very existence. Is this the end of time for our species? he asks. I reread your book, Hegemony or Survival, [and firstly,] you mentioned there that the typical life of a species is 100,000 years [and] that we may be coming to the end of this disfavor. And secondly, its an open question whether being smart, as we define smart, is an important way of averting disaster and preventing the disintegration of the species. [Hegemony or Survival] begins with the discussion by the great biologist Ernst Mayr, who [makes the point] that intelligence seems to be a kind of lethal mutation, Chomsky explains.
If you look through whats called biological success, what allows the species to survive and proliferate, turns out as you move up the scale of what we call intelligence, capacity to survive declines. So the species that are really very successful are beetles, for example, which have a fixed niche; they never change. Everything changes, the whole world changes, but they stick to their niche and keep reproducing and theyre fine.
As you move up to
bigger mammalstheir capacity to survive declines. What about when you get to humans? Well, you could argue that
we are now proving Mayrs thesis. Not so much for the reasons you mentioned, which are bad enough, but we are racing to destroy the possibility of organized human life. And its a cooperation of those who call themselves the best and the brightest, and the Trumpian boors
all racing toward disaster, perfectly consciously, a great testimonial to human intelligence. And thats only the beginning.
Chomsky discusses the incredible global failure to address the climate crisis, as well as the nuclear arms race, which are both leading humanity to a precipice that may be impossible to walk away from. The conversation later moves into a discussion of American empire and what Chomsky views as its little-understood but undeniable success...
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/noam-chomsky-america-has-built-a-global-dystopia/
- '1984' At Seventy: Why We Still Read Orwell's Book of Prophesy, The New Yorker, 2019
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/1984-at-seventy-why-we-still-read-orwells-book-of-prophecy
- There are elements of "1984," by George Orwell, that never seem to fade from relevance.
More, https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017563805
empedocles
(15,751 posts)appalachiablue
(41,178 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)dystopian issues do need airing, which is not seen much at stock market tops.
brush
(53,918 posts)Kaiserguy
(740 posts)The only specie smart enough to create the modern world and at the same time dumb enough to destroy that world because of what we created.