The Clean Water Act was a staggering bipartisan achievement. Now Trump is gutting it
theguardian.com
This is the single largest loss of clean water protections that America has ever seen and the timing couldnt be worse. It may be hard to remember these days, but the nation that led the world on to the stage of modern environmental protection was the United States.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/29/clean-water-act-bipartisan-trump
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)Everything.
Kaiserguy
(740 posts)us with his gutting of the Clean Water Act
Botany
(70,516 posts)n/t
Many of us knew this would be our fate back in Nov of 2016.
Botany
(70,516 posts)Nancy P. had it right when she said all roads lead to Putin.
Where Bolton Is Headed Putin
https://medium.com/@Simon_Rosenberg/where-bolton-is-headed-putin-71e09cff2e0c
Botany
(70,516 posts)MH1
(17,600 posts)Grr.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)where the water pollution got so bad the river caught fire.
I guess it's time to dig out my copy of his album, "Sail Away," which is so old it's vinyl. Now if only I can find my record player...
I'll put it on my bookshelf next to Rick Wilson's book, Everything Trump Touches Dies.
MH1
(17,600 posts)Yeah, electing Hillary in 2016 would have been just awful ...
RicROC
(1,204 posts)I just don't understand how one person, in this case the person posing as the President, can gut legislation voted on by both sides of Congress and signed by a previous President.
While I understand how previous executive orders may be altered, but what about sealed and signed laws.
Response to RicROC (Reply #11)
CrispyQ This message was self-deleted by its author.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)He also signed the Clean Air Act and established the EPA.
One of his Supreme Court appointees, Harry Blackmun, was the tiebreaking vote FOR Roe v. Wade.
(I love telling neocons that info. Really makes their unused heads spin.)
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)The laws main mechanism is simple: before discharging waste into the nations waters, polluters must first try to clean it up.
So how did the former lobbyists running the agencies sabotage the act? By radically shrinking it. By its terms, the act only protects waters of the United States. But according to this administration, waters of the United States does not mean waters in the United States. In their view, the Clean Water Act only applies to a subset of waters, and the rest are unprotected.
The scope of the contraction is staggering. In some states out west, 80% of stream miles would lose their protection. Drinking water sources for millions of Americans would be at risk from pollution. The administrations redefinition would leave millions of acres open for destruction wetlands that buffer communities from storms, serve as homes for wildlife and nurseries for fish and shellfish, and act as natural water filters.
This is the single largest loss of clean water protections that America has ever seen. And the timing couldnt be worse. From lead contamination in drinking water to the proliferating threat of toxic industrial chemicals, new threats to water quality are emerging daily.
Lonestarblue
(10,011 posts)Its a few years old, but set in a dystopian future where the wealthy have trashed the Earth and built their own paradise in a space station above the earth. Heres a description from a movie review site.
The film is set in 2154, when the planet has been ravaged by disease, pollution, and overpopulation. The wealthiest now live on a space station called Elysium, which can be seen in the clouds from Earth below. Max (Matt Damon) has grown up watching Elysium from his rundown, largely Latino L.A. neighborhood. A reformed car thief now working in a grueling factory jobhe's lucky to have it, he's sneeringly informedMax is trying to keep things together in a society openly rigged against the poor.
On this space "habitat," we follow the defense secretary (Jodie Foster), who offers a vigorous defense of her right to use unlimited force to benefit the liberty of a few. In a not-so-subtle commentary on the immigration debate, she shoots down refugees who try to land.
This feels like the Trump policy toward everything: destroy anyone who gets in his way (the media and anyone who goes against him), transfer wealth to the already wealthy, ensure health care only for the wealthy, rape our lands for the sake of corporate profits, and maintain total control over all decisions affecting the people not on Elysium. The difference I see from the movie is that with no change in how we do things, this situation will appear long before 2154, maybe a hundred years before.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)21st Century Feudalism is their plan. Antarctica will be their Elysium. And perhaps some far northern areas, as well. The rest of us can battle for the scant resources left in the scorched out/drowned out regions. The trajectory isn't looking good for most of humanity.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,435 posts)action taken by the Rump.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)c-rational
(2,594 posts)the destrucion of your enviornment is to allow the destrution of yourself.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)it is an issue they are passionate about regardless of partisanship.
edited to add: and use this after describing WHO is gutting the Clean Water Act:
On Earth Day, 1971, nonprofit organization Keep America Beautiful launched what the Ad Council would later call one of the 50 greatest commercials of all time. Dubbed The Crying Indian, the one-minute PSA features a Native American man paddling down a junk-infested river, surrounded by smog, pollution, and trash; as he hauls his canoe onto the plastic-infested shore, a bag of rubbish is tossed from a car window, exploding at his feet. The camera then pans to the Indians cheerless face just as a single tear rolls down his cheek.
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)Delmette2.0
(4,166 posts)They just can't see that -45 does not care about them. He knows he can throw $10,000 at their campaign fund, promise more $$ and then piss all over their state. That includes every state down wind or down stream if -45 can make money off the deal.
It's called a deal because it is a backroom agreement, not an open discussion in Congress with public comments and expert testimony.
jalan48
(13,870 posts)to benefit financially from these rules changes? My guess is they are the ones really responsible.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Don't forget, Senator Ron Johnson (R-eally stupid) owns a plastics factory in Oshkosh. He purchased it with his wife's family's wealth.
And then we have the fossil fuel fools with their off-shore drilling and leaky pipelines. They need some lovin' too.
Maybe WE need our life back--not just that BP douche.
jalan48
(13,870 posts)our own corporations and oligarchs cover for Presidential/Congressional actions they are responsible for.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)They're just as slimy as oligarchs.