Democracy Now! this morning- China Coronavirus SARS and HIV
Democracy Now! this morning
LAURIE GARRETT: Well, they covered up. I mean, this is typical, what Ive seen every time in China, every outbreak Ive been in there, is that you know, outsiders dont understand. China really has two governments that run in parallel. One is the official government, with people with titles, you know, minister of whatever. And the other is the party, the Communist Party. And one trumps the other, and thats the Communist Party. And its essentially kind of a shadow government, in the sense that not everybody knows who the party official is in charge of X, Y or Z. But the mode of the party is to always strive for stability. And thats the most common word in the Chinese political lexicon, you know, stability, stability. So nothing can rock the boat. Nothing can upset the order of society.
Well, whats upsetting to order of society more than an epidemic? And so the initial response of party officials whenever theres an outbreak is to stifle it as quickly as possible and stifle all news and information about it and spend as much time arresting, as I wrote about several weeks ago when this was first starting, that they were spending more energy arresting people for talking about this epidemic almost all of them healthcare workers, by the way than they were in dealing with it and confronting it. So, by the time they actually put out honest numbers and actually start telling the world the true toll, were several weeks in, and we have a huge problem on our hands. And then, now theyre just racing to keep up. The Hong Kong University has a spectacular team of epidemiology statisticians, whove been through SARS, been through bird flu, on and on down there, and theyve been analyzing the numbers of cases and reports through a variety of means. And theyve shown the underreporting rate is pretty consistently by more than 50% in fact, considerably more so that they say this currently reported toll total of about 17,000-and-change cases in mainland China, actually, thats the number it probably was about 10 days ago. And the true number at this moment is significantly larger.
LAURIE GARRETT: Well, when you ask, Why did SARS end? you know, you get different answers. In China, one of the most common responses is to say, Because the weather changed, as if the virus somehow was related to cold weather, and that as summer approached and it got hotter, the virus disappeared. That makes no sense to me biologically at all. It may make sense in terms of surfaces. Certain cooler surfaces may harbor virus longer than a hot surface. But other than that, it doesnt make a lot of sense to me.
What I observed was that China basically stopped it by doing a massive fever and quarantine program across the entire nation. So it was brought to a stop by a level of vigorous and robust action. But, you see, theyre doing the same thing now. And as I mentioned before, its all based on fever checks, and we now know this virus can spread from people who dont have fevers. So, theyre building a policy that biologically is flawed, wont work. So, when people ask me, Where is this all going? I say, Look, this is much worse than SARS. It is not as terrifically dangerous as a virulent flu epidemic. But its far more dangerous than anything weve seen on our horizon since the arrival of HIV.
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/2/7/laurie_garrett_china_coronavirus_response
Phoenix61
(17,019 posts)how can it be more dangerous than HIV?
58Sunliner
(4,410 posts)The word virulent-Virulence is a pathogen's or microbe's ability to infect or damage a host.
But the fact that people think China under-estimated rates of infection affects all the other data-rate of transmission, death rate, and an understanding of it's virulence.
We have vaccines and anti-viral meds for the flu-coronovirus- we don't yet. She said since the arrival of HIV, not that it is more dangerous.
58Sunliner
(4,410 posts)SARS supposedly took @ 4 months to infect @ 385 people, animal to human, human to human transmission. 4 months plus to mutate. This new virus infected thousands in less than a month? Both were brought to the attention of the media by whistle blowers. According to some experts, the SARS virus mutated again to become less lethal. It can't replicate if it kills the host. So the question then becomes-are they covering up a higher death rate? Because we know from some reporting that they have already done that. The WHO specifically mentioned in an initial briefing (after going to China), that they wanted different criteria for identifying active cases and deaths. The doctor who was a whistle blower on this virus was hospitalized 2-3 weeks before he tested positive. Is their testing faulty? Even here in the states people have to send samples to the CDC for verification. How does it work in China?
underpants
(182,904 posts)Thanks
58Sunliner
(4,410 posts)BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Delphinus
(11,841 posts)a link to this story in my email this morning ... the lockdown of information is quite troubling.