Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
Wed Jun 3, 2020, 05:58 PM Jun 2020

As Trump Threatens to Send Military Into Cities, Some GIs Refuse to Comply

By Candice Bernd, Truthout
June 3, 2020

Some National Guard and active-duty GIs are refusing to deploy to U.S. cities rising up against police-perpetrated killings, saying no to complicity in the repression of the American populace and that they have not been properly trained in riot response or de-escalation tactics on domestic soil.

Veterans and GI rights organizations told Truthout that dozens of GIs are reaching out to assess their options as President Trump orders military and federal police onto the streets of Washington, D.C., and threatens to use the 1807 Insurrection Act to send active-duty military into cities across the U.S. if governors cannot repress dissent in their states.

The National Guard has already mobilized 20,000 members in at least 29 states, and some governors, including Minnesota’s Tim Walz, have already declined Trump’s offer to send in military police. Trump has the authority, however, to deploy the military to states under the Insurrection Act, which would represent a dramatic escalation of Trump’s executive authority and likely spark pushback from state and local officials.

While the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 prohibits the domestic use of military for law enforcement purposes without specific congressional authorization, the Insurrection Act gives the president authorization to do so under certain circumstances, according to legal experts. The Insurrection Act has been invoked dozens of times in the country’s history, most recently during the 1992 uprising over the Los Angeles police officers’ beating of Rodney King.

But it’s not the legality of the president’s and governors’ deployment orders that is weighing on Guardspersons and active-duty soldiers; it’s the potential moral injury of brutalizing their own communities.

https://truthout.org/articles/as-trump-threatens-to-send-military-into-cities-some-gis-refuse-to-comply/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a962aeb6-e3d6-40fb-a999-14ddbb137fd1

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Trump Threatens to Send Military Into Cities, Some GIs Refuse to Comply (Original Post) milestogo Jun 2020 OP
having just retired as an Army JAG qazplm135 Jun 2020 #1
Isn't it one of the first thing recruits learn is that thay can't follow an illegal order? n/t brewens Jun 2020 #3
That is true Chainfire Jun 2020 #4
It's like a disclaimer. Similar to teaching bartenders to not over serve customers when they get brewens Jun 2020 #5
Plausible deniability Chainfire Jun 2020 #7
correct me if I'm wrong... BGBD Jun 2020 #8
That is a good question Chainfire Jun 2020 #9
He wants this so badly he can't stop !! Budi Jun 2020 #2
If the soldier was assigned to his hometown dreamland Jun 2020 #6

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
1. having just retired as an Army JAG
Wed Jun 3, 2020, 06:02 PM
Jun 2020

if I were still on duty and they asked me for a legal opinion, it would start with, this whole thing is illegal, and then ended there.

Chainfire

(17,538 posts)
4. That is true
Thu Jun 4, 2020, 09:42 AM
Jun 2020

however, they are also taught that to refuse an illegal order, you damn well better be right in your decision. It is easier for soldiers to just leave the thinking to their officers and follow their orders; that is how they are trained and that is what the vast majority will do.

Do not think that the all volunteer army is a place where liberal ideals flourish either in enlisted or the officer ranks.

brewens

(13,585 posts)
5. It's like a disclaimer. Similar to teaching bartenders to not over serve customers when they get
Thu Jun 4, 2020, 09:50 AM
Jun 2020

bigger tips for doing exactly that.

Get the troops signed off on that part of the training, then drill them on blindly following any order.

 

BGBD

(3,282 posts)
8. correct me if I'm wrong...
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 09:26 AM
Jun 2020

there's never been a conviction in the US military for following an order, legal or not.

Chainfire

(17,538 posts)
9. That is a good question
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 08:13 AM
Jun 2020

for which I don't have a good answer, however, William Calley argued that he was "just carrying out orders," but was convicted. I do not recall whether he offered credible evidence that he was ordered to massacre a village.

For those who are too young to remember, Calley was convicted of leading the massacre of a Vietnam village.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
2. He wants this so badly he can't stop !!
Wed Jun 3, 2020, 06:05 PM
Jun 2020

Wrong Trump!, governors did try to repress dissent in their states, they begged you to shut your mouth but you kept stoking the fires with your tweets & language.

They owe you nothing.

dreamland

(964 posts)
6. If the soldier was assigned to his hometown
Thu Jun 4, 2020, 04:34 PM
Jun 2020

There would be less violence. Which soldier would be the person known to fight his own?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»As Trump Threatens to Sen...