It's all going to come out sooner or later.

How are you this evening, Ms. elleng?

Because they did

But I think the shit that Barr and his master have pulled is going to come back and bite them--BIGLY!

Please, Karma--do that voodoo that you do so WELL!

remotely answered.

Bet on it.

Then they'll see.

Does a judge have more resources than congress to "inspire" them to show up and testify, or will they just ignore the judge? I'd sure love to see their butts thrown in jail!!!! I have a pretty good idea what would happen to me if I just ignored a subpoena, and I'd stay in jail until I complied.

Utterly insane what we have let them get away with. Formally . For the history books.

It's always worked before.

look at the glossary

hannity should be there for incidental references in the report but the only entry between graf and hawker is redacted completely.
and of the few other redactions in the glossary most are related to stone, corsi, an credico - all long time talk radio operatives - not social media geniuses.

the collusion is still happening right under our noses. putin has been feeding llimbaugh, trump's neighbor and golf partner, and rw radio since at least 2008

the incredible stupidity of ignoring talk radio continues

if your connections prove, and they sound logical, then foreign nations committed to First Amendment restrictions are seeding our Free Speech media to undermine our First Amendment and there's nothing we can do about it unless we admit this is a soft spot in our Bill of Rights and restrict our First Amendment to stop what's undermining us.

See how that works? We either allow it to erode us, or we plug the holes which erodes us just the same.

Repression is coming, Baby!

a democracy can't survive if we let a few hundred blowhards on 1500 coordinated radio stations repeat the same think tank coordinated lies all day to 50 mil a week.

the talk radio monopoly is not and should not be considered part of the free speech spectrum - it's a protected monopoly. even fox tv has to pretend to be balanced and occasionally entertain dissenting opinions. there are alternatives a click away for politics.

it's a very fixable problem, especially now with artificial intelligence allowing it to be digitized, studied/monitored finally. we've been studying fish without water. the problem started when reagan killed the fairness doctrine and it needs to be fixed, with or without a new FD

... fix? Trump?

Sorry, I'll take my chances with free speech.

what those stations have been screaming about liberals and dems for thirty years from every corner and stump in the country and we just walk by with earbuds in our ears talking about money in politics, GOTV, etc, hoping free speech and democracy can survive

rw radio is not a function of demand- it is a well protected monopoly propaganda operation that depends on its invisibility and for democrats to keep analyzing politics as if studying fish without water

so it's been selling corporations are people and money is free speech and regulating media raises cable casts (now internet), creating made-to-order procorporate constituencies while democrats chase their tails and blaming symptoms - like voter suppression, money in politics, and media consolidation

you can't keep free speech if you let fascist think tanks and putin feed an unchallenged 95% monopoly of 1500 coordinated radio stations, with limbaugh on the point, like we used voice of america around the world for 50 years

it's about saying fuck you to the advertisers and ad companies and all the university sports programs that support it until the ad industry has to democratize talk radio - the ONLY major medium operating with no challenge, outside the free speech spectrum

.... who is going to be in charge of "fixing" free speech?

Hint - not you.

I don't think there's anything terribly explosive in the redactions. I just think the judge found stuff for which there is no rationale for redacting - stuff that is merely embarrassing or concealed for political reasons, but for which there are no privacy or security issues - and he wants an explanation.

For transparency's sake, I hope he unredacts those areas where there's no legit rationale. The more we know, the better.

The whole process of creating a transcript would lend itself to limiting collateral damage as much as the real stuff

I'm thinking there are a few gotcha connections that would surprise no one, and the rest of the redactions were over minor points that were redacted to confuse, obfuscate, and point in other directions.

Would not be surprised if there were some juicy points too

Hell, us taxpayers paid for it, but the rethugs will fight it tooth and nail because they're afraid of TRUTH seeing the light of day

avoid justice for three years now.