Why are we in Afghanistan for the long haul?
By Eugene Robinson, Published: May 3
Show of hands: Does anybody really understand the U.S. policy in Afghanistan? Can anyone figure out how were supposed to stay the course and bring home the troops at the same time?
Im at a loss, even after President Obamas surprise trip to the war zone. The presidents televised address from Bagram air base raised more questions than it answered. Lets start with the big one: Why?
According to Obama, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al-Qaeda could never use this country to launch attacks against us. I would argue that U.S. and NATO forces have already done all that is humanly possible toward that end.
The Taliban government was deposed and routed. Al-Qaeda was first dislodged and then decimated, with over 20 of their top 30 leaders killed, according to the president. Osama bin Laden was tracked to his lair in Pakistan, shot dead and buried at sea. To the extent that al-Qaeda still poses a threat, it comes from affiliate organizations in places such as Yemen and from the spread of poisonous jihadist ideology. Al-Qaedas once-extensive training camps in Afghanistan have long been obliterated, and the groups presence in the country is minimal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/leaving-yet-staying-in-afghanistan/2012/05/03/gIQADCB1zT_story.html
obxhead
(8,434 posts)We're going to be there permanently.
sad sally
(2,627 posts)it ours, whether we want it or not) to be the adjudicators of right and wrong in the world, we will remain forever as occupiers.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Some of it can be found here:
Thankfully, our politicians and those related to them are not allowed to invest in companies engaged in war-related enterprises.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)and the pipeline route for proof. We will stay as long as the energy companies meed us to protect their profits.
sad sally
(2,627 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)that no one in the corporate media ever, EVER mentions the pipeline? You would think someone would at least bring up the subject so it could be ridiculed as just another conspiracy theory.
It's almost as if the govt. and their stenographers don't want the American people to even THINK there might be plans for a pipeline, because that would lead to asking inconvenient questions.