Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:31 AM May 2012

Glen Greenwald: Surveillance State democracy

http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/surveillance_state_democracy/

CNET‘s excellent technology reporter, Declan McCullagh, reports on ongoing efforts by the Obama administration to force the Internet industry to provide the U.S. Government with “backdoor” access to all forms of Internet communication:

'The FBI is asking Internet companies not to oppose a controversial proposal that would require firms, including Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, to build in backdoors for government surveillance. . . . That included a scheduled trip this month to the West Coast — which was subsequently postponed — to meet with Internet companies’ CEOs and top lawyers. . . .

The FBI general counsel’s office has drafted a proposed law that the bureau claims is the best solution: requiring that social-networking Web sites and providers of VoIP, instant messaging, and Web e-mail alter their code to ensure their products are wiretap-friendly.

“If you create a service, product, or app that allows a user to communicate, you get the privilege of adding that extra coding,” an industry representative who has reviewed the FBI’s draft legislation told CNET.'

As for the substance of this policy, I wrote about this back in September, 2010, when it first revealed that the Obama administration was preparing legislation to mandate that “all services that enable communications — including encrypted e-mail transmitters like BlackBerry, social networking Web sites like Facebook and software that allows direct ‘peer to peer’ messaging like Skype” — be designed to ensure government surveillance access. This isn’t about expanding the scope of the government’s legal surveillance powers — numerous legislative changes since 2001 have already accomplished that quite nicely — but is about ensuring the government’s physical ability to intrude into all forms of Internet communication.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glen Greenwald: Surveillance State democracy (Original Post) xchrom May 2012 OP
For me, this is the issue that defines Obama. saras May 2012 #1
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
1. For me, this is the issue that defines Obama.
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:28 AM
May 2012

Equal rights are pretty unimportant if they are equal rights to not jack shit.

Since I am not ever going to live in the corporate middle-class world, it matters not a flying fuck to me how well, or not well, it works. Truthfully they are irrelevant. The global economy only needs a few workers, and service workers at that, but it REALLY doesn't need a middle class.

So if Obama does something that contributes to a post-corporate world of equality, good.
If he does something to make our lives more corporate, fuck it, no matter who gets to be screwed by it and whether they like it.

How about a policy whereby whistleblowers are guaranteed asylum and freedom from prosecution until all the information they present is evaluated by authorities OUTSIDE the industry or agency being reported on? I'd support that.

How about a policy whereby officials who spy on Americans illegally immediately lose their jobs, and if found guilty are never allowed to work in positions of public trust again? I'd support that.

How about a policy whereby corporations who attack the legitimate government of the United States are charged with treason? I'd support that.

Asshole all the way.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Glen Greenwald: Surveilla...