Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,917 posts)
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 10:02 AM Jun 2012

Insight: From Alabama, an epic challenge to voting rights

Source: Reuters

Insight: From Alabama, an epic challenge to voting rights

By Joan Biskupic

CALERA, Alabama | Mon Jun 4, 2012 1:36am EDT

(Reuters) - Four years ago, in this small city of gentle hills, tall oaks and nine stoplights, an invisible line was drawn a few miles north of the center of town. It stretched up beyond Highway 22 and looped west across Interstate 65, sweeping in recent housing developments, the brown-brick Concord Baptist Church and a new Wal-Mart. The narrow five-square-mile rectangle enlarged Voting District 2.

It also radically changed the district's racial mix. The expansion brought in hundreds of white voters, cutting the proportion of black registered voters to one-third from more than two-thirds. The city, which said it had to redraw its district map to account for a population increase and land annexations, contended the new boundaries would not discriminate against blacks.

The U.S. Department of Justice was not persuaded. In a tersely worded, three-page letter emailed to the Calera city attorney on August 25, 2008, it voided the new map.

The letter set off a chain of events resulting in what could be the most important challenge in years to the 1965 Voting Rights Act. A lawsuit later brought by Shelby County, where Calera is situated, seeks to strike down the law's requirement that Alabama and other states with a history of discrimination obtain federal approval for any changes to districting and ballot rules. They argue that this federal "preclearance" obligation, mandated by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, is an outdated, unfair and unconstitutional relic of an Old South that no longer exists.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/04/us-usa-court-votingrights-idUSBRE85304M20120604

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Insight: From Alabama, an epic challenge to voting rights (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2012 OP
Oh hooey hooey hooey JustAnotherGen Jun 2012 #1

JustAnotherGen

(31,834 posts)
1. Oh hooey hooey hooey
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 10:16 AM
Jun 2012
They argue that this federal "preclearance" obligation, mandated by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, is an outdated, unfair and unconstitutional relic of an Old South that no longer exists.


It still exists. That's why they are trying to pull this shenanigan's in the first place.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Insight: From Alabama, an...