Congress should focus on firearms flow to Mexico
In 2006, when George W. Bush was president, federal law enforcement officials came up with a spectacularly dumb idea: Allow powerful firearms purchased in the United States to walk across the Mexico border, where authorities would trace the weapons and eventually nab the big-time criminals who supply guns to the ultra-violent Mexican drug cartels.
It is no surprise that most of the weapons promptly disappeared.
But the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, undeterred by failure, went back to the gun-walking technique again the following year -- and used it once more in 2009, after President Obama had taken office, in the tragic fiasco known as Operation Fast and Furious.
These are the facts, and they dont cover any Justice Department officials with glory. But neither do they remotely justify the partisan witch hunt by House Republicans who threaten, without legitimate cause, to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. Obama has responded by asserting executive privilege effectively shutting down the inquisition.
http://www.tallahassee.com/article/20120623/OPINION05/306230007/Eugene-Robinson-Congress-should-focus-firearms-flow-Mexico
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)I figured that would be in there somewhere. Just what we need a repeat of the AWB, and the control of Congress it cost us.
Igel
(35,320 posts)Obama's DOJ investigated what happened before Obama. They issued indictments.
Yet Fast and Furious was going on during those indictments and when they were saying that the former operation was wrong. If Obama or Holder authorized F&F, then they were investigating and indicting for the same kind of program they'd authorized; if they knew, then they allowed it to continue. This would be reprehensible, and both said they didn't authorize it and didn't know who did.
As far as I know, over a year later, we still don't know who authorized Fast and Furious.We know that a guy from the * years was heavily involved, but I haven't heard that he was a lone wolf.
If the * holdover was a lone wolf, no problem: say he's the baddie and nix him. If he wasn't, then there's a problem.
Of course, focus on the lowest-level guys and nail them. But I'd actually like to know who authorized what.