Mr. President, Arctic drilling is too risky
An excellent opinion piece by Shannyn Moore in tomorrow's Anchorage Daily News
http://www.adn.com/2012/07/07/2534935/mr-president-arctic-drilling-is.html
An open letter to President Barack Obama:
Dear Mr. President,
As a woman who worked very hard to make sure your last opponents were not elected -- walking door to door in the snow on your behalf, registering more than a thousand Alaskans to vote, exposing Palin in the national media, etc. -- I feel obligated to write you about a few of my concerns.
Your secretary of the interior, Ken Salazar, recently told reporters asking about Shell's drilling permits and Alaska's Arctic, "I believe there's not going to be an oil spill."
Sir, he just wrote the headline for the first oil spill under Arctic ice.
"I believe" is not good policy. I believe that unicorn fur is the most absorbent clean-up product.
<snip>
Where else might we apply the "I don't believe" analysis? How about: I don't believe I'll be in a car wreck so I won't wear my seat belt and I'll turn off the air bags. Really? No way. I'd be ticketed for not wearing a seat belt. Why? Because "I don't believe" doesn't prevent accidents. It's why we want every man, woman and child in this country to have access to affordable health care because "I don't believe I'll get sick" doesn't mean diddly.
Mr. President, you said, "Oil rigs today generally don't cause spills" just 18 days before BP's deepwater disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. You were right; they "generally" don't. Oil tankers generally don't run aground on charted rocks. But the Exxon Valdez did, and Alaskans waited 20 years for the Supreme Court to finally award 10 cents on the dollar. When I walked across a beach in Prince William Sound two years ago, my boot prints filled with a sheen of oil. Generally, accidents don't happen, but when they do, it doesn't matter whether you believed they could happen or not. More than 200 million gallons of oil gushed into the Gulf of Mexico. Two years later, the Gulf is still reeling, both ecologically and economically. There won't be a full recovery in my lifetime or yours.
<snip>
Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/07/07/2534935/mr-president-arctic-drilling-is.html#storylink=cpy
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Got it?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)In our political system there is no way to vote against the interests of oil companies.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)In Afghanistan, too.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I was just going to give this a kick for the daytime people, but my keyboard wasn't working for some reason.
sad sally
(2,627 posts)welfare 'er subsidies they'll be getting for the next four years, thanks to congress and the administration) just so the President can claim he's expanding domestic resource production and dismiss criticism by the Republicans that he's against this expansion.
Shell's testing of their new "containment" system in Puget Sound is their "I believe" policy, and by sending an aircraft carrier to keep the pesky protesters at bay, the administration is showing us who's in charge.