Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 08:59 AM Jul 2012

Origins of Our Economic Powerlessness: Tracing poverty, inequality to the enclosure of the commons


from OnTheCommons.org:


Origins of Our Economic Powerlessness
Ivan Illich traces poverty and consumer dependency back to the enclosure of the commons

July 16, 2012 | by Ivan Illich


Commons is a Middle English word. People called commons that part of the environment which lay beyond their own thresholds and outside of their own possessions, to which, however, they had recognized claims of usage, not to produce commodities but to provide for the subsistence of their households. The law of the commons regulates the right of way, the right to fish and to hunt, and the right to collect wood or medicinal plants in the forest.

The enclosure of the commons inaugurates a new ecological order. Enclosure did not just physically transfer the control over grasslands from the peasants to the lord. It marked a radical change in the attitudes of society toward the environment. Before, most of the environment had been considered as commons from which most people could draw most of their sustenance without needing to take recourse to the market. After enclosure, the environment became primarily a resource at the service of “enterprises” which, by organizing wage labor, transformed nature into the goods and services on which the satisfaction of basic needs by consumers depend. primarily a resource at the service of “enterprises” which, by organizing wage labor, transformed nature into the goods and services on which the satisfaction of basic needs by consumers depend.

This change of attitudes can be better illustrated if we think about roads rather than about grasslands. What a difference there was between the new and the old parts of Mexico City only twenty years ago. In the old parts of the city, the streets were true commons. Some people sat in the road to sell vegetables and charcoal. Others put their chairs on the road to drink coffee or tequila. Children played in the gutter, and people walking could still use the road to get from one place to another. Such roads were built for people. Like any true commons, the street itself was the result of people living there and making that space livable.
In the new sections of Mexico City, streets are now roadways for automobiles, for buses, for taxis, cars, and trucks. People are barely tolerated on the street. The road has been degraded from a commons to a simple resource for the circulation of vehicles. People can circulate no more on their own. Traffic has displaced their mobility. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://onthecommons.org/magazine/origins-our-economic-powerlessness



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Origins of Our Economic Powerlessness: Tracing poverty, inequality to the enclosure of the commons (Original Post) marmar Jul 2012 OP
Hmmm ... Igel Jul 2012 #1

Igel

(35,320 posts)
1. Hmmm ...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 01:23 PM
Jul 2012

I wonder how he thinks about the transfer of control over the atmosphere from everybody to the government.

No, it's not parallel to the "transfer from the peasants to the lord" that II says. Then again, II is wrong. Control of the open "commons" didn't go from the peasants to the lord. It went from everybody, peasants and lords, to just the lords (with, of course, the peasants tied to the land who were the ones with the most access to the fields).

As for the roads, it's a lifestyle choice, one open to and pretty much necessary given cultural constraints on housing construction and the prevalence of cars. He disapproves of certain lifestyles. Not his business.

A nearby neighborhood was built with his kind of neighborhood in mind. All the fronts of houses point in to a central path. Sort of like Venice "in" West LA. In this case the backyards have the garages, which debouche onto absolutely sterile streets. Setting out the trash cans brightens the street twice a week. The central path is meant to be a commons, where kids can play and people can congregate. But they don't. You can look down a row of 25 hours on either side and see no toys, no people. II's looking at cultural change and is having a conservative fit: "Must stop the change, it's not like I remember it, and the way I remember it was good!"

Eh. We'll all die eventually but life will go on, just not as we would have it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Origins of Our Economic P...