Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

earthside

(6,960 posts)
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 01:11 PM Jul 2012

Tattoos As Self-Mutiliation

This essay published yesterday over at CommonDreams.org has created quite a stir.

Tattoos As Self-Mutiliation by David Macaray

An excerpt:

According to the guy down at the donut shop, there are three possible explanations for the popularity of tattoos: Aesthetics, Imitation, and Exhibitionism.

Aesthetics makes perfect sense. A woman may think a large, red and blue flower on her shoulder adds to her overall attractiveness, makes her seem more feminine, and a man may genuinely believe that a fierce skull wearing a top hat makes him appear more masculine or menacing. There’s no accounting for tastes.

And imitation may simply reflect the powerful influence of peer pressure, something we’re all aware of and, if we’re honest with ourselves, something we’ve all succumbed to. When the high school student body president gets a tattoo on his/her arm, 200 classmates are going to want to get tattoos on their arms. So maybe that’s the explanation. Tattoos are viral.

As for exhibitionism, we can only hope that’s not the answer. We can only hope that a “Hey, look at me!” mentality hasn’t reached critical mass. “Hey, look at my design, look at my symbol, look at my message!” Don’t judge me by who I am, folks; judge me by what I have printed on me.

Tattoos are an interesting sociological phenomenon in 21st century America.

For myself, I find it fascinating how a once unique, individualistic 'statement' is so easily absorbed by the corporate popular culture, i.e., at least a half dozen reality cable television programs. What was briefly a non-conformist action has become very conformist, especially for young people.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

thelordofhell

(4,569 posts)
4. As long as she doesn't get any on her lower back
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 07:40 PM
Jul 2012

They don't call ' it "tramp stamp" because it's trendy

Coexist

(24,542 posts)
10. are you inferring if she gets one there she IS a tramp
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jul 2012

or it will make her BECOME a tramp?

And what is your definition of tramp?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
12. The lower back isn't that bad...
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jul 2012

But for the life of me I'll never understand the 'cleavage' tattoos...Now I have to work five times as hard not to stare like an idiot

YankeyMCC

(8,401 posts)
3. It's only recent historical times that tattoos were not something
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jul 2012

most people had for one reason or another.

Humans, particularly humans with skin easily colored all over the world have pretty much always used tattoos.

Not saying the fairly recent resurgence wasn't spurned at least in part by fads, I just think there is not surprised a fad isn't fading and is in fact seeming to continue to gain acceptance in mainstream culture.

I think that is a good thing, as the sooner it looses the forbidden fruit temptation parents can have more effective conversations with their children if and when they start thinking about getting tattoos.

carla

(553 posts)
5. "Monkey see,
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 09:15 PM
Jul 2012

monkey do" seems to be the rule that applies here. The first regular use of tattoos outside neolithic tribal practice was to mark property, slaves. I wonder how many know this?

earthside

(6,960 posts)
7. The tragic image that sticks in my mind ...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 11:21 PM
Jul 2012

... is old movie news reel film of the tattooed identification numbers the Nazi's wrote on their death camp victims.

Igel

(35,350 posts)
13. Intent matters.
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:40 PM
Jul 2012

A tattoo might mark you as belonging to one tribe or class, it might mark you as "adult", it might mark you as "convict."

It might be decorative: In an era of lots of light brown clothing perhaps you want something to make you stand out, since there's nothing else distinctive about you.

That's what I often tell my kids when they're talking tattoo. "I want to stand out." "Yeah, you're right. That would make you special when, really, there's nothing at all unique or special about you at all--your tastes, what you do, how you think, your goals, your abilities and talents. So you get that tattoo because it'll make you a person when you utterly fail to have anything else going for you." Can't say that to everybody. Too many would agree. Then again, "too many" would be "more than zero", and the number's far more than zero.

But most of them have a really, really strong negative reaction. I respond, "So you're saying you already stand out?" They say "of course." "Then why do say you need a tattoo to stand out. You already stand out."

It confuses them. Then I tell them the real reason they want a tattoo is to blend in. "You don't want one to stand out. You want one to be part of a group. It's just more group conformity--your choice of tattoo within the group matters a bit, but it's really the presence of the tattoo signalling that you're one of them that you need." Some miss the point. Some get it.

Modern tattoos aren't decorative. In some cases they're to mark the kid as belonging to a tribe. In some cases it's pathological, they don't like who they are and want to change it.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
6. I have seen a grand total of ONE useful tattoo.
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 10:39 PM
Jul 2012

A massage therapist had one on the inside of her upper arm. It said "Allergic to penicillin".

As far as decoration, I don't get it.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
8. Tats used to be seen a "working class trash" thing by middle class people
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jul 2012

That seemed to change as younger Gen-Xers entered adulthood in the 90s.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
11. I think the consent age has been lowered, too
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:24 PM
Jul 2012

I was in HS in the mid 90s and nobody I knew had a tattoo...Now I'm working on a college campus and more than half of the incoming freshmen I'm working with are inked...Some pretty heavily...

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
15. In a generation we'll be getting articles lamenting the youth of today
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 04:30 PM
Jul 2012

refusing to get tattoos like sensible people and thus putting their careers in jeopardy by refusing to fit in with mainstream ideals.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Tattoos As Self-Mutiliati...