Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:38 PM Aug 2012

Your car, tracked: the rapid rise of license plate readers (4,983 words)

Source: Ars Technica

Tiburon, a small but wealthy town just northeast of the Golden Gate Bridge, has an unusual distinction: it was one of the first towns in the country to mount automated license plate readers (LPRs) at its city borders—the only two roads going in and out of town. Effectively, that means the cops are keeping an eye on every car coming and going.

A contentious plan? Not in Tiburon, where the city council approved the cameras unanimously back in November 2009.

The scanners can read 60 license plates per second, then match observed plates against a "hot list" of wanted vehicles, stolen cars, or criminal suspects. LPRs have increasingly become a mainstay of law enforcement nationwide; many agencies tout them as a highly effective "force multiplier" for catching bad guys, most notably burglars, car thieves, child molesters, kidnappers, terrorists, and—potentially—undocumented immigrants.

Today, tens of thousands of LPRs are being used by law enforcement agencies all over the country—practically every week, local media around the country report on some LPR expansion. But the system's unchecked and largely unmonitored use raises significant privacy concerns. License plates, dates, times, and locations of all cars seen are kept in law enforcement databases for months or even years at a time. In the worst case, the New York State Police keeps all of its LPR data indefinitely. No universal standard governs how long data can or should be retained.

Read more: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/your-car-tracked-the-rapid-rise-of-license-plate-readers/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Your car, tracked: the rapid rise of license plate readers (4,983 words) (Original Post) Newsjock Aug 2012 OP
The argument about privacy Ilsa Aug 2012 #1
who is funding all this technology for LEO? grasswire Aug 2012 #2
We have cameras like that at every major intersection in my part of the county. 1monster Aug 2012 #3
And "Dissenter" will be a Boolean (Yes or No) value in the database.. IDemo Aug 2012 #4

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
2. who is funding all this technology for LEO?
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:48 PM
Aug 2012

Feds?

It sure would save tax dollars if this flow of unnecessary technology was stopped.

1monster

(11,012 posts)
3. We have cameras like that at every major intersection in my part of the county.
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 01:29 AM
Aug 2012

We were told that the camera were only for making sure the intersections were clear of traffic before the red light turned green.

But when I think of it, everyone of those intersections are also where cars enter from other highways leading into and out of town.

Why, one must ask, do they want all of this information? Just to track stolen vehicles? I find that hard to swollow.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Your car, tracked: the ra...