Representative Democracy, Heal Thyself
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/13624/representative_democracy_heal_thyselfThe demand to get money out of politics was a rallying cry for the Occupy movement, and its one that, thanks to the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, resonates deeply with much of the public. Citizens United opened the door for unlimited corporate spending in elections and is largely responsible for the Wild West of campaign finance in which we find ourselves this election season. But is money in politics the problem, or is it shorthand for record levels of inequality that will inevitably distort our political process?
In These Times spoke to Sarah Leonard of Dissent magazine, Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer, and Lisa Graves of the Center for Media and Democracy about progressive electoral strategies and what it would take to build a popular movement around something as wonky as campaign finance reform.
How is Citizens United impacting this years elections. And exactly how different is this from what weve seen in previous years?
Lisa: Theres no doubt that before Citizens United there were problems with things like Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, where an outside group runs a character assassination campaign that benefits a particular candidate, and that candidate can distance himself or herself from those dirty politics and mudslinging. But now we have that on steroids. This is going to not only be the most expensive election in U.S. history, it will be the most expensive election in world history.
Doug: Look, money has been a big force in American politics for more than a century. This emphasis on the role of money in politics is, I think, a sideshow, because rich people can spend money as individuals; they dont need to spend it as corporations. Only political agitation and mobilization can counter the effect of money.
This: 'But is money in politics the problem, or is it shorthand for record levels of inequality that will inevitably distort our political process?'
Uncle Joe
(58,417 posts)Thanks for the thread, xchrom.
tama
(9,137 posts)from basic human social psychology, which is much better suited for participatory forms of self-governance.
Studies show e.g. that those who rise to top of any social hierarchy tend to consider that the rules of the hierarchy don't apply to themselves but only to subordinates. Representative systems give preferential and unproportional rise to social psychopaths and pathological liers and passivate others freed or denied of participatory responsibility. Our strong inclination to follow the orders without questiong from hierarchic authorities can - and do - all too easily lead to all kinds of horrors when - not if - sociopaths get hold of the authoritative hierarchic power by processes of representative democracy. Hitler and Bush were predictable though extreme products of representative democracy, not exceptions.