Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
Sat Aug 18, 2012, 10:23 PM Aug 2012

WaPo Editorial: Mr. Romney’s ‘garbage’


By Editorial Board, Saturday, August 18, 5:10 PM

FORMER GOVERNOR Mitt Romney, the presumed Republican nominee for president, promises to lower everyone’s income tax rate without reducing revenue. This sounds terrific. Why didn’t we think of it sooner?

Mr. Romney says that he can achieve this seemingly magical result by “broadening the base” for income tax collection. This, too, sounds great. In principle, everyone favors “broadening the base,” also known as closing loopholes. But everyone favors closing someone else’s loopholes: those of oil companies, say, or of plutocrats who park their money in the Cayman Islands.

Unfortunately, such inviting targets, to the extent they exist, don’t cost the government much in the overall scheme of things. The “loopholes” that cost most are deductions and other tax provisions that most Americans consider sensible, if not God-given, rights: tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance, which according to the Congressional Budget Office will cost $2 trillion over the next 10 years; for pension and retirement savings ($1.8 trillion); for mortgage interest ($1.6 trillion) and charitable giving ($600 billion). Mr. Romney hasn’t said which of these he would trim or by how much.

Recently the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, showed that Mr. Romney’s plan would by necessity help the rich and hurt the middle class. In an interview with Fortune magazine last week, Mr. Romney took strong issue with this conclusion. “They made garbage assumptions and they reached a garbage conclusion,” he said. Contrary to the center’s assumption, he said, he would not take away middle-class tax breaks for “homeownership, charitable giving and health care.”

more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mr-romneys-garbage/2012/08/18/d109ac74-e883-11e1-8487-64e4b2a79ba8_story.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bucolic_frolic

(43,190 posts)
2. It's all about credibility from here on in
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 04:47 PM
Aug 2012

rMoney is not generating much in the believability department, at
least for Democrats and Independents and Eisenhower Republicans

The Tea Party believes him.

Stuart G

(38,436 posts)
3. I think the Washington Post has made an error, by insulting "garbage" this way.
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 04:57 PM
Aug 2012

Whatever this is, garbage has some uses and we know it.

Romney has no use, his taxes have no use..this arrogant attitude is much lower than garbage..
It is lower than the last ring in Dante's Hell.............

underpants

(182,830 posts)
4. WaPo and NYT have buried him in editorials in the last 2 days
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 05:40 PM
Aug 2012

Republicans have nothing if the press isn't covering for them. Nothing.

King_Klonopin

(1,306 posts)
6. Whose loophole are we talking about?
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 02:15 AM
Aug 2012

I truly believe that the only "loopholes" they want to cut are the
deductions that benefit the middle class.

IF they remove the mortgage interest deduction, I will be screwed.
Like most average Americans, who live from paycheck-to-paycheck,
I figured in my future tax refunds when I purchased my house 6 years ago,
and just refinanced this year. That refund, by the way, gets reinvested
right back into home repair and improvement, which in turn helps stimulate
the local economy -- where I SPEND that money. Eliminating that
deduction would screw the overall economy (just like plummeting home
values after the last burst bubble killed the home equity loan market)

Charitable donations also effects the poor and middle class most,
because they donate a higher % of income to charity than the
selfish 1% class.

Reducing capital gains tax to 15%, instead of 20 or 30%, is a "loophole" of
greater proportion, but eliminating that would effect the wrong people.

When I think of "loopholes" I think of Cayman Islands, investment losses,
and all the other crap that people like Mitt employ to weasel-out of
paying taxes, leaving people like me with the tab.

I hate these assholes!!!

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
9. If the eliminate the Mortgage Int Deduction what is the benefit of owning a home?
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 08:07 AM
Aug 2012

Without the $17,000 tax deduction we get to claim every year we would be screwed. I guess we could invest in a dressage horse?

jmowreader

(50,560 posts)
7. Ah, loopholes: the GOP's favorite way to raise taxes
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 03:12 AM
Aug 2012

The largest problem with the GOP's all loopholes, all the time tactics:

At this point in time, the Republicans are using the size of the debt and the deficit as weapons against the Democrats. Elect us, they say, and they'll reduce the deficit.

Sadly, this is the biggest lie they are pushing this cycle. According to their solemn pledge to Grover Norquist (which, as we all know, trumps the not-so-solemn pledge they make to the voters), any loophole closure, spending cut, or other financial legerdemain can be used for exactly one thing: to pay for yet another tax cut.

Does it make ANY SENSE WHATSOEVER to cut taxes when they're already too fucking low? And here I'm not even thinking of a tax increase. Just leave the taxes the fuck alone (or, at least, let the Bush cuts expire for all of us--yes, that is going to hurt but playtime is over) and start cutting giveaways to campaign donors like Medicare Part D and strategic missile defense. But that's not what will happen.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»WaPo Editorial: Mr. Romne...