The Big, Racist Lie at the Center of the Romney-Ryan Campaign
AlterNet / By Joshua Holland
The Big, Racist Lie at the Center of the Romney-Ryan Campaign
How long can they get away with blatantly lying?
August 24, 2012 |
The Romney team appears to have adopted a strategy of throwing so much dishonest spin around that the fact-checkers just throw their hands up in frustration. Along with his bald-faced lie that Obama raided Medicare, this week the campaign tripled-down on its universally debunked claim that the Obama administration had killed the welfare reforms passed by Bill Clinton. In fact, they defended that ad by citing a fact-free column by Mickey Kaus published on Tucker Carlson's always-wrong right-wing blog, the Daily Caller.
They hope to make inroads attacking welfare because, like the infamous "Southern strategy," it stokes racial animus. Political scientist Michael Tesler studied voters' reactions to seeing Romney's first welfare ad, and found that, among those who saw it, racial resentment affected whether people thought Romney will help the poor, the middle-class, and African-Americans.
Ed Kilgore, who writes for the Washington Monthly, knows as much about Clinton's welfare policies as anyone, having served as the Vice President of Policy for the Democratic Leadership Council, the centrist Democratic think-tank closely alined with Clinton, in the 1990s. Kilgore joined us on this week's AlterNet Radio Hour to discuss welfare and everything else the Romney-Ryan team is throwing against the wall and hoping to see stick. A lightly edited transcript of the discussion is below (you can listen to the whole show here-at link).
Joshua Holland: I want to talk about Romney-Ryan. Is this the first time both liberals and conservatives have been so gleeful over a vice-presidential pick, or is this the first time in recent memory?
Ed Kilgore: Its the first time I can really remember it being so equal. Occasionally, youll get varying descriptions of how one side thinks a candidate is a handicap and another side thinks he or she is an advantage. But in this case there actually is some overlap, a feeling that this offers the electorate a much clearer choice between the two parties. It certainly makes the Republican ticket stand for something other than, "take a chance on something different." Id say when the announcement came out over the weekend there was joy pretty much everywhere -- except perhaps among Republican political professionals, who were not happy.
lots more...
http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/big-racist-lie-center-romney-ryan-campaign?paging=off
alp227
(32,034 posts)And it's not just welfare. ANYTHING that contributes to, as Toure put it, the "n--gerization" of Obama the advisers will sneak in Romney's speeches.
For example, here is my take on Romney's Aug. 7 speech in suburban Chicago tying a "culture of dependency" around Obama admin's welfare directive:
The day after, Romney traveled to Iowa and characterized the Obama position on welfare as creating "a nation of government dependency". Given Iowa is a very dominantly white state, Romney's advisers knew which words work with whom.
No way am I suggesting Romney would ever mistreat his associates or friends who were black. He's just playing politics and knows what kind of rhetoric wins people's hearts.
(By the way, Reagan's "states' rights" speech was on Aug. 3, 1980. Too bad Romney couldn't schedule his Chicago stop on that day, not just to coincide with the original dog whistle political speech but also to spoil Obama's birthday in Obama's own home town, which is Aug. 4!)
Then on Aug. 24 Romney spoke at Commerce, Mich., a suburban town west of Detroit in western Oakland County, a region in Michigan's 11th cong. district that Thaddeus McCotter represented before resigning amid the petition forgery scandal. Guess what passed off as humor among the crowd? "No ones ever asked to see my birth certificate. They know this is the place where we were born and raised." So a joke referring to a long-discredited conspiracy theory casting Obama as a foreigner who infiltrated the white house, a theory so thoroughly knocked down it's hardly even funny. But would you not think Romney made that joke to register signals in the minds of some of the more bigoted people in the audience, who were extremely passionate about avoiding the city of Detroit, a city with a large black population?
At least Romney has so far avoided anything that'd spill the beans such as Santorum's "I don't want to make black people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money" phrase that so embarrassed Sanatorium he made the excuse he really meant "blah people".
Thom Hartmann had a great commentary "The Republican legacy of dog whistle politics" on Jul. 24: