The problem of left unity
By Richard Seymour
August 28, 2012
... The latest rumble has been over Julian Assange, Wikileaks, US imperialism and the rape allegations, which has produced more mutual distrust and resentment on the left than I have seen for at least weeks. The disagreement seems to be between those who think the rape accusations against Assange have been politicised in order to facilitate his forward extradition to the US, and those who think Assanges supporters have greatly exaggerated this risk in order to justify his refusal to go and face these allegations in Sweden ...
There is, however, a potentially comforting straw in the wind. After all, the Greek left is itself bitterly divided. Although unity has often been achieved in concrete struggles among networks of activists, the political forces are far from unified. This is a real handicap, but it has not prevented the emergence of Europes most promising radical left for more than three decades. Part of the reason that Syriza, despite its limited social basis, has been able to project such strong support electorally is its ecumenical approach to the left. Although it has never succeeded in winning over the support of rivals such as the Greek Communist Party, it has sought to position itself as a "canopy" for those forces to the left of social democracy. And in the elections, it proposed a united government of the left, with a resulting poll leap that astonished its leadership ...
I think we have three related issues. First, regardless of protestations to the contrary, we sometimes do treat difference as betrayal. Second, we occasionally forget to subordinate divisions among ourselves to those in the wider society. Third, for all that we are practical types, we often forget that our arguments should be oriented toward political action in some way ...
The least interesting interventions have simply reproduced the polarising tendencies that are amplified through social media like Twitter, where snark and self-righteous sentiment-mongering is the currency of interaction. (Imagine being stuck in a room with a bunch of intelligent people who nonetheless constantly trademark their mundane thoughts with a hash tag, or over-value expressions such as "roflcopter", "lmfao", "wtaf", "zomg" and "step away from the internet". Then imagine they wont shut up, ever. Then imagine youre one of those people.) ...
http://links.org.au/node/3003
tama
(9,137 posts)First International (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_International) the trend has been growing factionalism and polarization. Authoritarian and libertarian left don't tend to get along so well, which is the main polarizing force. Authoritarian centrist movements leads to factionalism due power struggle for the position of authority, libertarian movements are more spontaneous and less structured, and the scope and depth of theoretical strategic and tactical differences is well known. But differences of thought don't override unity of heart. Working through the system and outside the system are not mutually exclusive strategies and tactics but complementary. In Greece both various anarchist activity and level of organisation and support for Coalition of Radical Left (Syriza) has surged, and though I don't have any direct evidence, I'm pretty sure that in last election this time also many anarchists voted Syriza, which is an inclusive movement, not dogmatic. Greeks are united in their heart in their desire for something better, but in elections fear mongering campaign by foreign governments and other representatives of global capitalism cave small "victory" to neoliberal right wing coalition of ND and Pasok.
In US two party reality there is no party of the left. Libertarian wing of the Republican party is now appears now to be breaking way from the authoritarian increasingly xenophobic and hysterically afraid party establishment. Occupy! mobilized and energized the left and libertarian political underground and grass roots of US society in new ways of inclusive politics of heart.