Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,021 posts)
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 08:13 PM Sep 2012

FBI vs. Google: The Legal Fight to Unlock Phones

A legal battle is brewing between technology companies and the U.S. government over whether law-enforcement agents have the right to obtain passwords to crack into smartphones of suspects.

Google Inc. earlier this year refused to unlock an alleged pimp's cellphone powered by its Android software—even after the Federal Bureau of Investigation obtained a search warrant.

Google's unusual and controversial challenge to the search warrant indicates how murky the legal standards are for new technologies such as smartphones. Under the Supreme Court's so-called Third Party Doctrine, government agents can often obtain data stored with third parties without obtaining a search warrant.

But that standard doesn't take into account data as sensitive as a password—which can be the key to unlocking a larger trove of information such as emails, texts, calls and address lists.

...

In the current Google case involving the alleged pimp, FBI Special Agent Jonathan R. Cupina obtained a search warrant in March allowing him to request that Google provide "any and all means of gaining access, including login and password information, password reset, and/or manufacturer default code" for an Android phone—the Samsung Galaxy Exhibit— belonging to Dante Dears.

(Google the title for full article, and the URL is http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303644004577524790015525450.html)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»FBI vs. Google: The Legal...