Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 07:19 AM Sep 2012

Australia Seeks to ‘Manage’ the Poor While Making Them Poorer

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/09/22-0


These terrace apartments in Sydney, Australia--known as 'The Block'--are the home to many impoverished Aborigines, who now face the indignity of an Income Management program. (Torsten Blackwood/AFP)

When Mitt Romney derides the legions of Americans who are supposedly utterly dependent on government and are ruining the country's entrepreneurial spirit, we should remember that while this disdain for the poor may have a uniquely American inflection, the greed-is-good ethos flourishes in other rich nations. In the land down under, we see a mirror image of the political establishment's frontal assault on poor communities, with welfare policy acting as a cudgel for blaming the epidemic of poverty on the poor themselves.

The Australian government has been tightening its grip on welfare benefits through the Income Management program, which essentially dictates how the poor should spend their benefits. Participants may have about 50 to 70 percent their money placed under state control, reserved for essential items like food.

Like welfare reform in the United States, this is retrofitted paternalism: participants must spend the "quarantined" money using a “Basics Card” at government-approved outlets. The rationale is that too many poor people would squander money on gambling, drinking, pornography and other unproductive things when given a chance.

The program was first piloted in destitute aboriginal communities that had become notorious for cases of family crisis and child abuse. Income Management is now spreading to several new areas, according to the Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS), with enrollment based on “referral from child protection authorities” and referrals from social workers “on the grounds of ‘vulnerability.’ " The targeting of these already stigmatized groups--indigenous people, parents in troubled homes, and others deemed financially incompetent--reflects the myth that poverty is cultural and not the result of oppressive structures.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
2. Moral of the story. If you demand society give you money for your basic needs, don't complain if
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 09:26 AM
Sep 2012

society demands you spend its money on your basic needs.

That's true for most programs in these United States e.g. California http://www.calfresh.ca.gov/pg846.htm

What can CalFresh benefits be used to purchase?

CalFresh benefits can be used to purchase:

Foods for human consumption.
Seeds and plants to grow food for household use.

What can you not purchase with CalFresh benefits?

CalFresh benefits cannot be used to purchase:

Any non-food item such as pet food, soaps, paper products, household supplies, grooming items and cosmetics.
Alcoholic beverages or tobacco products.
Vitamins and medicines.
Any food that will be eaten in the store. *
Any food marketed to be heated in the store. *

SILVER__FOX52

(535 posts)
3. This is completely wrong................
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 10:32 AM
Sep 2012

and is a diversion to hide the real reason for poverty ...................the wealthy accruing all the wealth to themselves and stashing it in hidden bank accounts around the world. This is estimated to be $ 17 Trillion . Put 50% of their wealth in a fund to provide capital for economic expansion, ONLY, and you would see all this poverty dry up. Guaranteed. That's the real problem.

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
4. You claim there is $17 Trillion in bank accounts that is not invested? If so then that money earns
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 10:45 AM
Sep 2012

zero return.

Does that make sense to you?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Australia Seeks to ‘Manag...