Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Death Toll of Watergate
from Consortium News:
The Death Toll of Watergate
November 17, 2012
Exclusive: Major gaps in the history of Watergate and Iran-Contra have let Republicans minimize those scandals by comparing them to the fabricated scandal over the Benghazi attacks. A fuller understanding of Watergate would reveal its links to Richard Nixons prolonging the Vietnam War, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
Republicans are fond of comparing their scandal-mongering like the current hype over the terrorist assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya with genuine scandals, like Watergate, which sank Richard Nixons second term, and Iran-Contra, which marred Ronald Reagans last two years in office.
The GOPs false equivalence represents both an effort to puff up their latest accusations against Democrats and an attempt to minimize the misconduct of those two Republican presidents. For instance, one favorite GOP comment about Benghazi is: No one died at Watergate. Four brave Americans died in Benghazi.
This apples-and-oranges sophistry misses the point that Watergate and Iran-Contra were complex conspiracies that required intensive investigations to unravel their secrets (many of which remain hidden or in dispute to this day) while the Benghazi affair boils down to an easily resolved question as to why the U.S. intelligence community withheld some of the details in the immediate aftermath of the attack last Sept. 11.
The answers seem to be that the Benghazi consulate had evolved into a CIA base for secret operations and that U.S. intelligence didnt want to tip off the attacks perpetrators regarding how much the agency knew about their identities. So, the word extremists replaced specific groups and the CIA affiliation of two slain Americans was withheld. ....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2012/11/17/the-death-toll-of-watergate/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1871 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Death Toll of Watergate (Original Post)
marmar
Nov 2012
OP
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. du rec. nt
That which is shown is proven.
I remember listing as each fact of Watergate was told to the public. There were many then as today that can not hear the truth since it would wreck their idea of the present. I know that we have the ability to understand the facts and make a sound decision. I do not think there are many people who vote GOP who can make a sound decision based on facts since these people are biased or just plain STUPID.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)3. Following an internal link -- the roots of Watergate go back to 1968: sabotaging Vietnam peace talk
Consortium News is a national treasure. For those of us who lived through the horrors of 1968, the election of Nixon and the bizarreness of Watergate, here is a contemporary, high-level account.
LBJs X File on Nixons Treason
http://consortiumnews.com/2012/03/03/lbjs-x-file-on-nixons-treason/
...snip
On May 14, 1973, Walt W. Rostow, who had been national security adviser during some of the darkest days of the Vietnam War, typed a three-page memorandum for the record summarizing a secret file that his former boss, President Lyndon Johnson, had amassed on what may have been Richard Nixons dirtiest trick, the sabotaging of Vietnam peace talks to win the 1968 election.
...snip
Those secret activities surfaced with the arrest of the Watergate burglars in June 1972, but they had begun much earlier. In his memo for the record, Rostow expressed regret that he and other top Johnson aides had chosen for what they had deemed the good of the country to keep quiet about Nixons Vietnam peace-talk sabotage, which Johnson had privately labeled treason.
I am inclined to believe the Republican operation in 1968 relates in two ways to the Watergate affair of 1972, Rostow wrote. He noted, first, that Nixons operatives may have judged that their enterprise with the South Vietnamese in frustrating Johnsons last-ditch peace initiative had secured Nixon his narrow margin of victory over Democratic Vice President Hubert Humphrey in 1968.
Second, they got away with it, Rostow wrote. Despite considerable press commentary after the election, the matter was never investigated fully. Thus, as the same men faced the election in 1972, there was nothing in their previous experience with an operation of doubtful propriety (or, even, legality) to warn them off, and there were memories of how close an election could get and the possible utility of pressing to the limit and beyond. [To read Rostows memo, click here,here]
...snip
Much more: http://consortiumnews.com/2012/03/03/lbjs-x-file-on-nixons-treason/