Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
More Than Nutritious: Why Organics Are Still Healthier
from YES! Magazine:
More Than Nutritious: Why Organics Are Still Healthier
Two recent studies concluded that organic food is no more nutritious than non-organic food. But the value of organics involves health on multiple levels, from that of farmers to eaters to the planet itself.
by Robin Broad, John Cavanagh
posted Nov 19, 2012
We have seen many outrageous studies that reinforce the worldview of giant corporate agribusiness over the years, but two in the last three months really take the cake.
Before we tell you what they are, we ask you to take 10 seconds and answer this one-question survey:
My understanding is that those who buy organic do so because:
1) They want to avoid the pesticides used in non-organic produce.
2) They are looking for more nutritious food.
If you are like the American University students who took this survey, you correctly selected number one. No one who answered our survey chose number two on nutrition. Indeed, the main selling point for eating organic has long been that it is healthier because of the absence of chemicals in your food. Think, for example, of Rachel Carson, who exposed to the world the horrors of pesticide exposure 50 years ago in her classic Silent Spring.
Which brings us to two attention-grabbing studies: In early September, Stanford University researchers (publishing in the Annals of Internal Medicine) made headlines in mainstream media by claiming to have proven that organic food is no more nutritious than food grown with pesticides. On its heels, a second studythis one by the American Academy of Pediatricsreached the same basic conclusion. Both studies were presented as harsh blows against organic farming, essentially telling parents that there was no nutrition-based reason to buy organics for their children. ............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.yesmagazine.org/blogs/john-cavanagh-and-robin-broad/yes-on-organics-no-on-deceptive-headlines
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1500 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More Than Nutritious: Why Organics Are Still Healthier (Original Post)
marmar
Nov 2012
OP
cilla4progress
(24,766 posts)1. Thank you!
Posted on FB, where this discussion was had earlier this year, with a farmer friend disputing the value of organics. This explains my position succinctly: avoiding, limiting pesticides is better for me, my family, and the planet!
cprise
(8,445 posts)2. 3) We want to avoid genetically modified food. n/t
2naSalit
(86,775 posts)3. But then consider...
Uncle Joe
(58,417 posts)4. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, marmar.