I haven't read this piece, so maybe it's in there:

The utter contempt and disrespect for white males displayed under a thin veneer of regionalism, lifestyle dislikes, and rural suspicions.

White males are the all-purpose punching bag for anyone who wants to blame or deflect. And there are NO societal constraints for the lowest blows.

Another "unremarkable" consideration, I suppose.

Did you borrow it from O'Reilly?

and disparage the real inequalities that women face tend to favor the Gungeon. I NEVER see them try to quash discussion about discrimination against black, brown, yellow, gay or disabled people, by the way. Just WOMEN.

I used to see it frequently from the Men's Rights group guys, but lately I'm seeing more of this sad self pity paired with gun love.

Men. Guns. Perceived victimhood. Refusal to consider the other point of view......

Just some consistencies I'm noticing.

While males ( poor babies ) ...yes , I'm one. : the ultimate Minority.
Regional : Southern ? If shoe fits
Rural: I love " god and guns and hate my gubmint" ? If other shoe fits?

I am tired of listening to redneck teabillys who pray at the altar of Guns , God (really , not mine) and anti- Gubmint...trashing intellectuals , artists , debate/discussion , compromise etc.

Theirs is a world of Fear and Loathing...in the worst way.

Especially some of the "lowest blows?"

that features sexist and racist advertising and after which the incidence of abuse of women skyrockets, depending on if the abuser's team wins or not



RAH RAH

Although I hadnt heard that before.

Of COURSE massive celebrations of muscle and force will seep into behavior. The fact that there's such massive denial about the fact of male violence in a society that celebrates manly force and the strong over the weak (in ALL iterations) is massively frustrating.

As Recursion said, if mere denigration explained the explosion of male violence, then women and African Americans and etc. should have been exacting violent revenge long ago.

regardless of the extensive social and personal damages those decisions produced."

Precisely why some of us on DU try to get people's attention on outsourcing issue. Politicians on BOTH SIDES allow it to continue.

Precisely why we need PRO-LABOR (not DLC/Third Way) Dems.

Surely they bear a nice chunk of the blame

And direct the scared, ignorant, overwhelmed and helplessly rageful masses by providing handy scapegoats that deflect from the real criminals.

In the uk last year there wear 35 people killed by guns, in the USA there was 326 people killed by guns yesterday? And you don't need gun control

If a person/writer were to take a real look at violence in America it would expand well beyond the extremely limited framework of the current meme "white males are angry". The article attempts to do that but focuses on "At present, the US is home to a vast group of predominantly white, dispossessed, enraged men."

How about the 50 million poor people and/or the entire 99% -- not just the white ones. How about people without health care, people in prison, people who can't get a basic education?

Virginia Tech, Asian.
Binghamton NY, shooter from Vietnam.
DC snipers, African American.
Fort Hood shooter is of Palestinian descent.

Off the top of my head. But yes, if we eliminate all the shootings by non whites then all the shootings are by whites.

"Fraad reflects on the pervasiveness of mass shootings by white and Asian men and reviews some of the features that distinguish the US from other developed countries that may contribute to exceptional US gun violence."

They are just not all that accurate.
If facts are the point, then facts matter. These shooters are all men, they are not all white men. This is simple fact.

All men. Not all white nor all white and Asian. Rainbow of violence. That's just how it is.

President Obama challenged us with this question: Do we want a society in which we are all in this together, or in which we are all in this alone.

Our answer, as always, ever since the post-war generation at any rate, is ALONE. We aren't a society, we are a collection of individuals all looking out for number one. We live in a culture that worships the anti-social personality. We worship greed and self-interest over everything else, we plan vacations while our children lose their homes, we give tax cuts to the wealthy while tens of millions of kids go hungry, we don't care about education or our infrastructure or unaffordable healthcare. We don't care, unless it's us. We have a generation that burned the country to the ground, snorted the ashes, then pissed on the smouldering rubble.

We call this the American way.

And we wonder why disenfranchized and disturbed people go from being anti-social -- as we taught them -- to sociopathic. How, we wonder, can these monsters do this? Do they not care about the children or other victims? The answer, of course, is no.

No.

"Some men just want to watch the world burn." That line from a recent movie resonated with a generation, not because they were disturbed by the idea, but because they could sympathize. They want to watch the world burn, and they are one tiny psychotic break away from striking the match.

In my opinion

The right-wing's attitude, which has filtered out to society as a whole is "screw you, I've got mine." Nothing else matters but the individual. There is a sickness here that is deeper than who is to blame for mass killings. It affects all of us.

In the middle east, men with little to do become terrorists. Here they become mass killers.

Some have even been graduate students. It just doesn't strike me that the people who kill people are doing so because they aren't finding their role in the economy.

as 'power over' instead of 'power with'. Power over others, and thus safety and happiness, is the fairy tale we have to wake up from and grow beyond, if we are to survive as a society.

The gun issue is absolutely about personal power, people who feel the most 'left behind' in this changing world do not have adequate coping skills to shift with the times. Ironically the values of cooperation, community, tolerance, harmony with nature are very ancient and what is required is remembering who we are as Earthlings.

We are a part of the Earth, and the power-over myth that has been taught to humans through religious, racist, and cultural myths has interfered with us holding on to our ancient roots as human beings living in harmony with each other and our planet. The uses of fear and loathing to craft these myths has resulted in a very sick society, because they have a war mentality.

The myths that are harming this country and the world at large, are based on war and a form of Armageddon. This dystopian view of the future teaches people to hoard food, guns, land and an eternal vigilant state of fight or flight. It is a very destructive state of mind, and needs to be countered on every level and at every opportunity---and replaced with better ways of coping. I agree with Dennis Kucinich that we need a Department of Peace. Put as much time and effort studying ways of helping people cope, and the sharing of resources.

We as a country need to grow up past consumerism, exceptionalism, racism, dominionism and all the other destructive religious interpretations--and truly recognize these old assumptions as the toxic and harmful belief systems that are at the root of our identity crisis.

These myths teach us to accept 'power over' as a given--by those FEW people who have defined it, because their power mostly depends upon us BELIEVING and ACCEPTING this definition. As we believe in 'power over', we GIVE our POWER of CHOICE away to them. This has been going on for millennia, and today we are seeing the culmination of this belief system. This is how we have arrived to accept a piece of paper as more valuable than life.

Peace~~Felix

Word.

There is no direct profit to be made from saving children's lives.

The column makes it sound like white men are being hurt the most by the capitalist economy. In fact, women and minorities are hurt by capitalism even more than white men. If being abused and disenfranchised made people into mass murderers then we would see a lot more female and minority mass murderers. So the basic premise of this column is incorrect.

The statements in the final paragraph in the message are mainly true, but it's not true that "white men" or "our young men" are the ones who suffer the most from these inequalities.

Free our men!!!