Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,045 posts)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:15 PM Feb 2013

Obama keeps newspaper reporters at arm’s length

“Entertainment Tonight” scored one last year. The New York Times did not.

“The View” has gotten several. The Washington Post hasn’t had one in years.

Albuquerque radio station KOB-FM’s “Morning Mayhem” crew interviewed him in August. The last time the Wall Street Journal did so was in 2009.

America’s newspapers have trouble enough these days, what with shrinking ad revenue and straying readers. But the daily print-and-pixel press also hasn’t gotten much love lately from the biggest newsmaker in the business: President Obama.

When Obama does media interviews these days, it’s not with a newspaper. TV gets the bulk of the president’s personal attention, from his frequent appearances on “60 Minutes” to MTV to chitchats with local stations around the country. Magazines — including the New Republic, which recently landed an interview conducted by its owner, Facebook co-founder and former Obama campaign operative Chris Hughes — are a distant second, followed by radio.

(...)

White House officials “have been fairly clear that broadcast interviews are a more valuable venue for them,” said David Lauter, Washington bureau chief of the Tribune Co.’s newspaper group, which includes the Los Angeles Times, Baltimore Sun, Chicago Tribune and Orlando Sentinel. “We’ve had several conversations with them during the campaign. .?.?. Ultimately, their feeling was, if it doesn’t have a broadcast component, they’re not very interested.”

(...)

But Dee Dee Myers, President Bill Clinton’s first press secretary, said Obama’s lack of interest in newspapers also reflects a changing media ecosystem. “Newspapers increasingly reach smaller audiences,” she said. What’s more, “they’re edited. You have a lot less control” over the message.

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/obama-keeps-newspaper-reporters-at-arms-length/2013/02/10/3638c5ae-7082-11e2-ac36-3d8d9dcaa2e2_singlePage.html

KKOB-FM interview: http://www.kobfm.com/common/page.php?pt=Morning+Mayhem+Talks+to+President+Obama&id=271&is_corp=0

Washington Post's last sit-down interview with the president was on July 23, 2009, as an online video supplement to a print article. Myers is right about the "changing media ecosystem": people are more likely to pay attention to an interview with Obama or any public figure if there's an audio/visual component rather than just in print.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama keeps newspaper reporters at arm’s length (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2013 OP
great FirstLight Feb 2013 #1
Surely "journalism" today doesn't mean newspapers Doctor_J Feb 2013 #2
Most of the newspapers are right-wing rags Doctor_J Feb 2013 #3
It makes sense that he would spend more time with a type of media that reaches more people davidpdx Feb 2013 #4
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
3. Most of the newspapers are right-wing rags
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:28 PM
Feb 2013

letting them edit what the president says would be a mistake.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. It makes sense that he would spend more time with a type of media that reaches more people
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 07:24 AM
Feb 2013

Look at how many newspapers and magazines have stopped publishing actual hard copies and gone entirely online. Newsweek ran their last issue at the end of 2012. Give Time a year or two and they will be next.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Obama keeps newspaper rep...