The Hubris of the Drones -- essay by Bill Moyers
February 12, 2013
by Bill Moyers and Michael Winship
Last week, The New York Times published a chilling account of how indiscriminate killing in war remains bad policy even today. This time, its done not by young GIs in the field but by anonymous puppeteers guiding drones that hover and attack by remote control against targets thousands of miles away, often killing the innocent and driving their enraged and grieving families and friends straight into the arms of the very terrorists were trying to eradicate.
The Times told of a Muslim cleric in Yemen named Salem Ahmed bin Ali Jaber, standing in a village mosque denouncing al Qaeda. It was a brave thing to do a respected tribal figure, arguing against terrorism. But two days later, when he and a police officer cousin agreed to meet with three al Qaeda members to continue the argument, all five men friend and foe were incinerated by an American drone attack. The killings infuriated the village and prompted rumors of an upwelling of support in the town for al Qaeda, because, the Times reported, such a move is seen as the only way to retaliate against the United States.
Our blind faith in technology combined with a false sense of infallible righteousness continues unabated. Reuters correspondent David Rohde recently wrote:
The Obama administrations covert drone program is on the wrong side of history. With each strike, Washington presents itself as an opponent of the rule of law, not a supporter. Not surprisingly, a foreign power killing people with no public discussion, or review of who died and why, promotes anger among Pakistanis, Yemenis and many others.
Rohde has firsthand knowledge of what a drone strike can do. He was kidnapped by the Taliban in 2008 and held for seven months. During his captivity, a drone struck nearby. It was so close that shrapnel and mud showered down into the courtyard, he told the BBC last year. Just the force and size of the explosion amazed me. It comes with no warning and tremendous force
Theres sense that your sovereignty is being violated
Its a serious military action. It is not this light precise pinprick that many Americans believe.
***
more: http://billmoyers.com/2013/02/12/the-hubris-of-the-drones/
ETA: video here http://billmoyers.com/segment/bill-moyers-essay-when-we-kill-without-caring/
If you watched Moyers' most recent show, this is basically a transcript of the last segment, AFAICT. The last para is memorable.
JuniperLea
(39,584 posts)And splitting hairs to say one means of murder is worse than others seems pathetically disingenuous.
How many more innocents are killed by drones than by bombs or boots on the ground.
Fewer American soldiers die when drones are employed over boots on the ground... so fewer do die... but it's still war.
I think we would be better served to fight against all war instead of splitting these murderous hairs.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Read the story.
indepat
(20,899 posts)infallible righteousness, a pure absolutely infallible righteousness oozing from every pore.
Uncle Joe
(58,424 posts)Thanks for the thread, eppur_se_muova.