Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Forget Drones. The Real Problem Is “War Without Boundaries”
Lets ignore, for a moment, the debate over killing civilians and assassinating American citizens with armed drones.
Lets hold off on wondering whether these drones create more enemies than they kill.
Instead, lets focus on the context in which were using them, and why its problematic.
In the Washington Post last week, Mark Jacobson called armed drones the weapons of choice for todays battlefield without boundaries. For The Daily Telegraph, Con Coughlin wrote in favor of using drones by arguing that al-Qaeda and its allies are waging a war against the West which knows no boundaries.
This theme of a global battlefield has become common and accepted. And what Jacobson, Coughlin, and others are saying, of course, is partially true: that terrorists and gangsters are not confined by lines on a map. But somewhere along the way, we redefined the words war and battlefield.
Lets hold off on wondering whether these drones create more enemies than they kill.
Instead, lets focus on the context in which were using them, and why its problematic.
In the Washington Post last week, Mark Jacobson called armed drones the weapons of choice for todays battlefield without boundaries. For The Daily Telegraph, Con Coughlin wrote in favor of using drones by arguing that al-Qaeda and its allies are waging a war against the West which knows no boundaries.
This theme of a global battlefield has become common and accepted. And what Jacobson, Coughlin, and others are saying, of course, is partially true: that terrorists and gangsters are not confined by lines on a map. But somewhere along the way, we redefined the words war and battlefield.
http://nation.time.com/2013/02/13/forget-drones-the-real-problem-is-war-without-boundaries/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 2155 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forget Drones. The Real Problem Is “War Without Boundaries” (Original Post)
dixiegrrrrl
Feb 2013
OP
This isn't the 1980s. There are no more walls,borders. It's a good thing we're not isolationists
graham4anything
Feb 2013
#3
Drones are high tech snipers, high altitude "hit men". To me, it doesn't seem like a good
ladjf
Feb 2013
#4
To combat this we obviously need a perpetual police state around the world.
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#5
Yes, the concept of perpetual "war" without boundaries is the **CENTRAL ISSUE** here
Martin Eden
Feb 2013
#9
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)1. Wars without End. Perpetual War.
I'm probably at just that age where I can say WTF, what ever happened to the wars that eventually end, like Viet Nam, WW2, and (sort of) Korea?
I think IKE knew what was afoot.
tblue
(16,350 posts)2. Without geographical or time or financial boundaries
And it's self perpetuating too. Attack > blowback > retaliate > blowback > retaliate.........
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)6. Defense contractor's wet dream....
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)3. This isn't the 1980s. There are no more walls,borders. It's a good thing we're not isolationists
ladjf
(17,320 posts)4. Drones are high tech snipers, high altitude "hit men". To me, it doesn't seem like a good
thing for us.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)5. To combat this we obviously need a perpetual police state around the world.
It's only logical. And most will go willingly. Guaranteed security. Just be willing to be "chipped" like our pets.
Buddha help us.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)7. Bush's fourth term. nt
valerief
(53,235 posts)8. Why have war at all? nt
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)9. Yes, the concept of perpetual "war" without boundaries is the **CENTRAL ISSUE** here
Regardless of the technology or methods we employ pursuant to that war.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)10. We also redefined:
Enemy, cost of war, strategy, and morality
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)11. Agreed. Drones are an instrumentality, not the main problem.
Congress needs to redefine the 2001 AUMF, and quickly.