Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,439 posts)
Tue Mar 12, 2013, 04:57 PM Mar 2013

Regrettable: The troubling things I learned while rereporting Bob Woodward's Book on John Belushi

Slate:

By Tanner Colby|Posted Tuesday, March 12, 2013, at 5:42 AM


http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2013/03/bob_woodward_and_gene_sperling_what_woodward_s_john_belushi_book_can_tell.html


A little more than a week ago, during an interview with Politico, Bob Woodward came forward to claim he’d been threatened in an email by a “senior White House official” for daring to reveal certain details about the negotiations over the budget sequester. The White House responded by releasing the email exchange Woodward was referring to, which turned out to be nothing more than a cordial exchange between the reporter and Obama’s economic adviser, Gene Sperling, who was clearly implying nothing more than that Woodward would “regret” taking a position that would soon be shown to be false.


A rather trivial scandal, but the incident did manage to raise important questions about Woodward’s behavior. Was he cynically trumping up the administration’s “threat,” or does he just not know how to read an email? Pretty soon, those questions tipped over into the standard Beltway discussion that transpires anytime Woodward does anything. How accurate is his reporting? Does he deserve his legendary status?


I believe I can offer some interesting answers to those questions. Thirty-one years ago, on March 5, 1982, Saturday Night Live and Animal House star John Belushi died of a drug overdose at the Chateau Marmont in Los Angeles—which, bear with me a moment, has more to do with the current coverage of the budget sequester than you might initially think.*

Two years after Belushi died, Bob Woodward published Wired: The Short Life and Fast Times of John Belushi. While the Watergate sleuth might seem an odd choice to tackle such a subject, the book came about because both he and Belushi grew up in the same small town of Wheaton, Ill. They had friends in common. Belushi, who despised Richard Nixon, was a big Woodward fan, and after he died, his widow, Judy Belushi, approached Woodward in his role as a reporter for the Washington Post. She had questions about the LAPD’s handling of Belushi’s death and asked Woodward to look into it. He took the access she offered and used it to write a scathing,
lurid account of Belushi’s drug use and death.

When Wired came out, many of Belushi’s friends and family denounced it as biased and riddled with factual errors. “Exploitative, pulp trash,” in the words of Dan Aykroyd. Wired was so wrong, Belushi’s manager said, it made you think Nixon might be innocent. Woodward insisted the book was balanced and accurate. “I reported this story thoroughly,” he told Rolling Stone. Of the book’s critics, he said, “I think they wish I had created a portrait of someone who was larger than life, larger than he was, and that, somehow, this portrait would all come out different. But that’s a fantasy, not journalism.” Woodward being Woodward, he was given the benefit of the doubt. Belushi’s reputation never recovered.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regrettable: The troubling things I learned while rereporting Bob Woodward's Book on John Belushi (Original Post) Stuart G Mar 2013 OP
Woodward was quickly loathed and untrusted by many in that circle blm Mar 2013 #1
It does make me wonder supernova Mar 2013 #2
in the Watergate story he was working with another reporter and everything they wrote was Bill USA Mar 2013 #4
K&R. Fascinating article about bad writing. Brickbat Mar 2013 #3
K&R It's fascinating how horrible Woodward is at his job. FreeBC Mar 2013 #5
k/r -- good read! fishwax Mar 2013 #6
Boy, I believe it! Wonder if Judy Belushi regretted it. Cha Mar 2013 #7

blm

(113,083 posts)
1. Woodward was quickly loathed and untrusted by many in that circle
Tue Mar 12, 2013, 05:05 PM
Mar 2013

and some refused him the time of day early on.

He reported many stories wrong.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
4. in the Watergate story he was working with another reporter and everything they wrote was
Tue Mar 12, 2013, 07:41 PM
Mar 2013

subjected to excruciating scrutinization by editors at WaPo - because of the unprecedented content - before it went to print. Plus, we've had 40 years for others to go over everything they wrote plus whatever additional evidence could be uncovered and nothing has come out to contradict what they wrote. Of course Nixon's own tapes helped corroborate the body of their work. {yes, Nixon took care of 17 minutes of the tapes, but everybody (well, except for some dedicated fascists) is hoping that technology will eventually enable Nixon's taped statements to one-day be recovered}.

I personally think, in the ensuing 40 years, ole Bob is perhaps experiencing early onset Alzheimers. THat's the most benign scenario I can think of.

Cha

(297,545 posts)
7. Boy, I believe it! Wonder if Judy Belushi regretted it.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 03:08 AM
Mar 2013

I didn't read the book.. all I remember about John Belushi is he was a funny guy.

And, I'm reminded of him when I see his brother Jim in shows.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Regrettable: The troublin...