US faces $6bn bill to ship equipment home from Afghanistan
Fighting wars is expensive, but so is winding them down. As the US prepares to ship most of its weapons, vehicles and other equipment home after more than a decade in Afghanistan, the bill for the move will be a staggering $6bn, officers in charge of the complex process say.
Rusting Soviet tanks and guns still dot the Afghan landscape, serving as bleak memorials to violence of the 1980s, and perhaps a spur to Nato forces to ensure there are no similar reminders from the last decade of conflict.
The US military has pledged it will level any bases not handed over to Afghan forces and fly out, drive out or scrap the weapons, equipment and tens of thousands of Humvees and expensive MRAPs mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles it has shipped in since 2001.
To do this, it must sort through 100,000 shipping containers and strip down nearly 30,000 vehicles scattered in hundreds of bases across Afghanistan's mountains and deserts, all by a 2014 deadline, while making sure nearly 70,000 US soldiers still in Afghanistan are not left short of equipment they need to fight.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/25/us-bill-equipment-home-afghanistan
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)and I believe ALL the equipment should be returned Stateside or to wherever it might be best utilized. It will be expensive, but I see no benefit of it being left behind.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)on just moving the stuff to somewhere more local. They failed on that by not managing to start another war in the vicinity.
Aristus
(66,341 posts)Like the end of the Vietnam War.
Granted, most of the helicopters and stuff that got pushed overboard belonged to the South Vietnamese Air Force. But most of it was given to them by us. What a waste.
Hear that, Pentagon? War is waste!