On pot laws, respect the states
By Erwin Chemerinsky and Allen Hopper
March 27, 2013
It may be surprising, but no state is required to have a law making possession of marijuana, or any drug, a crime. Therefore, any state can legalize some or all marijuana possession if it chooses. The federal government, if it chooses, can enforce the federal law against its possession and use, but it is up to each state to decide what to criminally prohibit, based on the 10th Amendment.
This basic insight has been lost in the public discussion about whether the initiatives legalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana passed by Colorado and Washington voters in November are preempted by federal law. The two states will soon finalize regulations to implement those initiatives, including how to tax and regulate marijuana. U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. told a recent meeting of state attorneys general that the Justice Department review of the initiatives was winding down, suggesting an imminent decision as to whether it intends to challenge the initiatives as being preempted by federal law.
This month, eight former heads of the Drug Enforcement Administration urged Holder to enjoin the new state laws. Peter Bensinger, DEA chief from 1976 to 1981, told the Associated Press: "This is a no-brainer. It is outrageous that a lawsuit hasn't been filed."
Is it outrageous? Or is it just an intelligent assessment of the legal landscape?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-chemerinsky-marijuana-legalization-20130327,0,716034.story
xchrom
(108,903 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Being head of the DEA must really fuck a person up, when it comes to being able to deal with the concept of liberty.
firenewt
(298 posts)could benefit from medical marijuana. Indiana - where 2 semesters of high school science consists of the Old and New testaments. Not that bad yet but getting there.