Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
Mon May 27, 2013, 08:28 AM May 2013

Op-Ed: What if we were REALLY serious about ending poverty?

In the wake of Apple’s battles before Congress in defense of its $100 billion tax haven overseas we have a guest post by Joe Brewer, key strategist for /The Rules, a movement aimed at identifying the structural causes of poverty and the means to deconstruct these harmful systems – including tax havens.

For decades now, those of us in the West have been told that we can bring poverty to an end by any of the following methods:

Wear a wrist band;
- Give $10 a month to feed a starving child;
- Party hard at a rock concert;
- Sign a petition;
- Vaccinate against polio.
I
could continue but you probably can already see where I am going with this. We have been bombarded with simple and painless actions that attempt to dumb down the vast complexity of global poverty to get rich, distracted white people to care about starving dark people.

Needless to say, this approach is both offensive to those in need and ineffective at creating the scale and breadth of change that can actually bring chronic poverty to an end.

This begs the question What if we were REALLY serious about ending poverty?

FULL ARTICLE: http://www.humanosphere.org/2013/05/op-ed-what-if-we-were-really-serious-about-ending-poverty/


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Op-Ed: What if we were REALLY serious about ending poverty? (Original Post) OneGrassRoot May 2013 OP
I'm not reading the rest, I despise the sort of language games this man is playing Bluenorthwest May 2013 #1
LOL. Yeah, that'll teach 'em. PSPS May 2013 #2
Huh? OneGrassRoot May 2013 #3
I followed the link to his organization, The Rules... OneGrassRoot May 2013 #4
Kind of a crazy idea, premium May 2013 #5
I can see problems with getting money to people without addresses. Neoma May 2013 #6
Point taken. premium May 2013 #7
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
1. I'm not reading the rest, I despise the sort of language games this man is playing
Mon May 27, 2013, 09:16 AM
May 2013

He speaks like a clerical trickster, so while I oppose poverty, I don't trust this Brewer. Reeks of a desire to control and you can bet that anything he promotes will benefit himself first and foremost.

PSPS

(13,617 posts)
2. LOL. Yeah, that'll teach 'em.
Mon May 27, 2013, 09:50 AM
May 2013

It's merely another piece that describes how the financial, political and legal systems are rigged to benefit the top 0.01% and how this pretty much institutionalizes poverty. There are two sets of rules: One of secrecy, tax havens, insider shenanigans where misanthropes and sociopaths thrive, and another that is for, to take a phrase from the lyrics of Gilligan's Island, "the rest."

None of this is new or even controversial, especially here at DU.

OneGrassRoot

(22,920 posts)
4. I followed the link to his organization, The Rules...
Mon May 27, 2013, 12:33 PM
May 2013

While I don't know him and didn't know of him until reading this piece this morning, I don't see anything suspicious as you seem to.

again


http://www.therules.org/en/the-movement

HOW WE WORK

We operate as a decentralised network with several campaign hubs around the world, including in Johannesburg, Mumbai, New York and Rio. The focus of these hubs is to identify issues, opportunities, technologies and regional strategies for each campaign.

The ‘engine room’ for our campaigns is our Working Group, which is made up of more than 70 people from around the world. Members come as individual volunteers, not as representatives of their respective organisations. They come from a broad range of organisations – from civil society, to grassroots advocacy groups, to policy think tanks, to technology providers.


The sole objective of the Working Group is to help create campaigns for viable, alternative rules that serve the interests of the world’s majority, with disproportionate benefit to the poor, vulnerable and marginalised among us.

If you would like to be considered as a member of the Working Group, please send an email to campaigns@therules.org.

If you would like to know more about who we are and the way we work, please email info@therules.org.


Where does /The Rules get its funding?

We are supported from a variety of sources, including Purpose, the New Venture Fund and through crowdfunding.

We do not accept money from governments or corporations.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
5. Kind of a crazy idea,
Tue May 28, 2013, 11:58 AM
May 2013

just throwing this out there, but if we're serious about ending poverty, why not have the Federal Govt. give every adult american a one time gift, tax free, of $1,000,000 to spend as they see fit?
It would only cost the Govt. appox., oh, let's say, $150,000,000, that kind of money would only fund the Govt. for about 4 hours, (I'm guessing, it might be more or less, not sure).

The catch is that people would have to be responsible on how it's spent, because, after that, no more.
And, you would still have to go to work to keep the economy working, but it would be a huge stimulus to the economy.

Like I said, just a crazy idea.

Forgot to add, those that already have a net worth of $1,000,000 or more, would not be eligible.

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
6. I can see problems with getting money to people without addresses.
Wed May 29, 2013, 09:23 PM
May 2013

And doing what you suggest might cause inflation that won't go down after the money is spent. Which would in turn cause more poverty later in the long run. It doesn't fix problems like high student loans, high health care costs, and high mortgage rates. Which will probably soak up all that money you give them anyways. That's kind of why they don't do that sort of thing. If we're not trying to fix the problems that make people poor in the first place, it will just be a spike and a huge dip.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Op-Ed: What if we were RE...