Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 08:18 AM Jun 2013

Why was a Sunday Times report on US government ties to al-Qaeda chief spiked?

A whistleblower has revealed extraordinary information on the U.S. government’s support for international terrorist networks and organised crime. The government has denied the allegations yet gone to extraordinary lengths to silence her. Her critics have derided her as a fabulist and fabricator. But now comes word that some of her most serious allegations were confirmed by a major European newspaper only to be squashed at the request of the U.S. government.

In a recent book Classified Woman, Sibel Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI, describes how the Pentagon, CIA and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as 2001. Her memoir, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story, published last year, charged senior government officials with negligence, corruption and collaboration with al Qaeda in illegal arms smuggling and drugs trafficking in Central Asia.

In interviews with this author in early March, Edmonds claimed that Ayman al-Zawahiri, current head of al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden’s deputy at the time, had innumerable, regular meetings at the U.S. embassy in Baku, Azerbaijan, with U.S. military and intelligence officials between 1997 and 2001, as part of an operation known as ‘Gladio B’. Al-Zawahiri, she charged, as well as various members of the bin Laden family and other mujahideen, were transported on NATO planes to various parts of Central Asia and the Balkans to participate in Pentagon-backed destabilisation operations.

According to two Sunday Times journalists speaking on condition of anonymity, this and related revelations had been confirmed by senior Pentagon and MI6 officials as part of a four-part investigative series that were supposed to run in 2008. The Sunday Times journalists described how the story was inexplicably dropped under the pressure of undisclosed “interest groups”, which, they suggest, were associated with the U.S. State Department.

http://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/whistleblower-al-qaeda-chief-u-s-asset/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why was a Sunday Times report on US government ties to al-Qaeda chief spiked? (Original Post) dipsydoodle Jun 2013 OP
Rhetorical question, I assume. djean111 Jun 2013 #1
Who was running the State Department in 2008? Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #2
. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #3
The info she described was about 'old' stuff, 2001 and prior, and story 'dropped' in 2008. elleng Jun 2013 #4
Original 'Gladio' is an interesting subject cprise Jun 2013 #5
Sibel is a DU'er yodermon Jun 2013 #6

elleng

(131,084 posts)
4. The info she described was about 'old' stuff, 2001 and prior, and story 'dropped' in 2008.
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 01:31 PM
Jun 2013

'describes how the Pentagon, CIA and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as 2001. . .

innumerable, regular meetings at the U.S. embassy in Baku, Azerbaijan, with U.S. military and intelligence officials between 1997 and 2001, as part of an operation known as ‘Gladio B’.'

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Why was a Sunday Times re...