Colleen Kollar-Kotelly allowed NSA to collect all our Data warned that if the public found about it,
challenged it in a court, it could be considered unconstitutional.
"Perhaps this judge has been portrayed unfairly, as collaborating with the government. But more important, it seems to put a face-- THE face-- on the American who decided it was okay to spy on every other American.
Regardless of her raising of concerns, she went ahead and, with her unique power, as head of the secretive FISA Court, made an even more secret decision to approve the worse spying in the history of America. In spite of evidence of abuses, that the 2006 WaPo article reported, she went ahead and approved further, more egregious and aggressive spying. It looks like she never said no, when asked.
She should be called before congress and questioned. And she should be more worried about what she DID than what is said about her so far. There is no question that she did approve the horrific level of spying we now know the NSA engages in.
The question is, how did any protector of the citizens-- the duty of every elected and appointed government official, ever allow a single person to make such an important decision-- and who decided to keep it secret? Because they violated their oath and should be punished to the full extent of the law."
http://www.opednews.com/articles/FISA-Judge-Who-Approved-Ma-by-Rob-Kall-130630-473.html
northoftheborder
(7,575 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)It's fantastic when someone other than Bush does it, etc.!
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Response to KurtNYC (Reply #3)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)According to Tice the surveillance was just step one of being able to blackmail whoever you need to blackmail. We have seen the government use blackmail elsewhere -- Abu Gharib was about creating materials (photographs, dirty secrets) that could be used to blackmail and control Iraqis after they were returned to the populace.
Apparently blackmail works pretty well.
midnight
(26,624 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Those who rub shoulders with the international super-rich don't have to be blackmailed.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)You have to have long term control. Money doesn't do that.
meow2u3
(24,774 posts)Their targets are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Either they take the hush money or pay the price with their careers and/or reputations.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)How long did it take?
And who says that anyone has ever refused to accept their money, or their positions of power?
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)colorado_ufo
(5,738 posts)again to the public's attention. When I first read what was included in the Patriot Act, I was shocked. The provision that most moved me was that, at any time, the government could demand a list of all the library books that any individual had ever checked out, and the library was obligated to give it to them. Any library or librarian refusing to do so could be prosecuted under the terms of the Patriot Act. They do not have to burn books. Why burn them, when they can be used as a handy source of evidence against someone?
They know everything now, including what you download on your Kindle or Nook or iPad or whatever. They probably laugh at any attempt at encryption. So many bytes of data that they need to introduce new mathematical terms to describe them.
The wonder of it all is that, looking out any window, life goes on as usual. To see the cars pass, the beauty shops giving perms, diners pouring coffee, and children having birthday parties at a pizza place, no one would imagine that this, this egregious violation of rights and privacy, was taking place in the background, 24 hours day day, for over a decade.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)The era of the Warren Court is over. In fact, Earl Warren died in 1974.
Bill I-think-NAFTA-is-a-good-idea Clinton appointed Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.
Most of the federal judges have been appointed by Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, and Obama.
If the judicial system hasn't saved us by now, it's not going to.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Wow. It sounds like she should be removed from the bench ASAP. At the least, she is imcompetent. At worst, she is corrupt.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Dan
(3,582 posts)how John Edgar Hoover was able to stay in power for so long?