Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Rand Paul's Detroit Shock Doctrine
Rand Paul's Detroit Shock Doctrine
Rick Perlstein on July 21, 2013 - 9:59 PM ET
Detroit has now declared bankruptcy. A judge has ruled the act illegala decision that may or may not stand. Naturally, New Yorks fiscal crisis forty-eight years ago comes to mind, though in many respects the differences are more important than the similarities: New York was one of the worlds financial and cultural capitals, its private economy largely thriving; as such, the news of governments bare coffers was shocking, a revelation, something the world at first had a very hard time getting their mind around. While whats happening to Detroit, no ones idea of an economic capital, isnt surprising at all...
To wit: here comes Senator Rand Paul, saying nothing would be more splendid than to let a major city go bankruptbecause with bankruptcy, you get new management, better management, and by getting rid of contracts, contracts that give you where [sic] public employees are getting paid twice what private employees are and things come back more to normal. No matter that so far the White House says only that its monitoring the situation, though former Obama auto czar Steve Ratner says he hopes Obama will pump federal money into the city. That is what Paul distorted into his claim that apparently the president is making indications that Detroit can be expected to be bailed out. And that, he says, will happen only over his dead body. Because municipal bankruptcy would give Paul the chance to do what right-wingers like him always do, starting with New York in 1975: make excuses for slashing the public sector.
Shock doctrine stuff, in other words. The unwinding of whats left of the welfare state, by whatever means at your disposal. Same story, then and now. In 1975, its most prominent voice was William Simon, President Fords Treasury secretary, who leveraged his work as the butcher of New York to become a major conservative movement leader...
Read more: Rand Paul's Detroit Shock Doctrine | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blog/175373/rand-pauls-detroit-shock-doctrine#ixzz2ZmzUcr62
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook
Rick Perlstein on July 21, 2013 - 9:59 PM ET
Detroit has now declared bankruptcy. A judge has ruled the act illegala decision that may or may not stand. Naturally, New Yorks fiscal crisis forty-eight years ago comes to mind, though in many respects the differences are more important than the similarities: New York was one of the worlds financial and cultural capitals, its private economy largely thriving; as such, the news of governments bare coffers was shocking, a revelation, something the world at first had a very hard time getting their mind around. While whats happening to Detroit, no ones idea of an economic capital, isnt surprising at all...
To wit: here comes Senator Rand Paul, saying nothing would be more splendid than to let a major city go bankruptbecause with bankruptcy, you get new management, better management, and by getting rid of contracts, contracts that give you where [sic] public employees are getting paid twice what private employees are and things come back more to normal. No matter that so far the White House says only that its monitoring the situation, though former Obama auto czar Steve Ratner says he hopes Obama will pump federal money into the city. That is what Paul distorted into his claim that apparently the president is making indications that Detroit can be expected to be bailed out. And that, he says, will happen only over his dead body. Because municipal bankruptcy would give Paul the chance to do what right-wingers like him always do, starting with New York in 1975: make excuses for slashing the public sector.
Shock doctrine stuff, in other words. The unwinding of whats left of the welfare state, by whatever means at your disposal. Same story, then and now. In 1975, its most prominent voice was William Simon, President Fords Treasury secretary, who leveraged his work as the butcher of New York to become a major conservative movement leader...
Read more: Rand Paul's Detroit Shock Doctrine | The Nation http://www.thenation.com/blog/175373/rand-pauls-detroit-shock-doctrine#ixzz2ZmzUcr62
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1393 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul's Detroit Shock Doctrine (Original Post)
MinM
Jul 2013
OP
lastlib
(23,238 posts)1. minor correction: 1975 was thirty-eight yers ago....
...not forty-eight.
navarth
(5,927 posts)2. need I say it?
FUCK Rand Paul and his ilk.