Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Montana Upholds Ban on Corporate Electioneering, Leads Growing National Revolt
Published on Thursday, January 12, 2012 by [font color="blue"]CommonDreams.org[/font]
Montana Upholds Ban on Corporate Electioneering, Leads Growing National Revolt
by Jeff Milchen
On December 30, the Montana Supreme Court issued a stunning ruling, rejecting arguments that the U.S. Supreme Courts landmark decision in Citizens United vs. FEC applied to Montanas century-old ban on direct corporate election spending. The 5-2 ruling overturned a lower court and reinstated Montana's Corrupt Practices Act, a citizen initiative passed to confront some of the most overt corporate corruption in American history.
While the Montana ruling detailed several ways in which the Corrupt Practices Act differed from the federal statute struck down in Citizens United, the justices clearly rejected much of the U.S. Supreme Court's rationale. Citizens United struck down a federal law that prohibited corporations from directly spending company funds to advocate for or against political candidates.
One key distinction in Montana's case was that the state presented extensive evidence of actual corruption, which the U.S. Supreme Court found lacking in Citizens United. And while Citizens United did not address nonpartisan and judicial elections, Montana's law protects the very justices who decided the case from being intimidated or corrupted.
Of course, money drowning out the voice of citizens can happen in almost any election now, thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court bestowing Bill of Rights protections upon corporations - entities never mentioned in our Constitution. Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Citizens United also asserted that "independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption," a view rejected by the Montana Justices. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/01/12-0
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1211 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montana Upholds Ban on Corporate Electioneering, Leads Growing National Revolt (Original Post)
marmar
Jan 2012
OP
unionworks
(3,574 posts)1. thanks k&r
It's refreshing to hear about a victory!
montanacowboy
(6,089 posts)2. I am proud of my state for this
at least we still have some judges with common sense unlike some of the politicians of the repukian persuasian here
Uncle Joe
(58,363 posts)3. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, marmar.