Snowden’s remaining docs unlikely to tie US hands
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, July 26, 2013, 2:39 am
... The Justice Department is not discussing its prosecution strategy. But while the U.S. isnt eager for any more classified information to be disclosed, theres little chance Snowden will be able to use what he has as a bargaining chip to negotiate his prosecution or extradition. Thats because giving into threats would risk opening the door for others to take similar action in the future ...
Im betting that there is virtually nothing that Snowden could do or threaten to persuade the (U.S. government) not to prosecute, said Peter Zeidenberg, a former federal prosecutor who was on the team that prosecuted I. Lewis Scooter Libby, the Bush administration official who revealed the name of a CIA officer. Zeidenberg said doing so would send a damaging message from the U.S.: If you are going to steal secrets, get the crown jewels; that way, the government will never dare to prosecute ...
Zaid said every time Snowden releases more documents it could create additional criminal charges. Zaid is not working on Snowdens defense and hasnt been contacted by the leaker. But if he were representing Snowden, Zaid said, Id tell him to shut up and accept the marriage proposal from Russian spy Anna Chapman. On July 3, the attractive redhead who was swept up with nine other sleeper agents and deported from the U.S. in 2010 tweeted, Snowden, will you marry me? ...
Graymail is a common defense tactic, and three decades ago a law was passed to combat it. Attorneys say the law was meant to let judges sort out the classified information behind closed doors and determine what the defense genuinely needs to make public. If the judge concludes the defendant cannot get a fair trial without spilling secrets, the government can decide whether to go forward or drop the case ...
http://www.kansasfirstnews.com/2013/07/26/snowdens-remaining-docs-unlikely-to-tie-us-hands-2/
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Because Snowden is not connected enough to warrant a presidential pardon, like Scooter was.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Scooter was a loyal minion. It is the disobedient who must be punished. The law is just a tool for that.
struggle4progress
(118,332 posts)propaganda, probably conducted by Cheney's contacts, who were also interested in undermining the international arms-control regime, because in their view arms-control limited US military flexibility on the world stage. From their PoV, they got a two-for-one out of the affair: they undermined some credible opponents of the Iraq war, and they demolished a non-proliferation operation without having to take the blame for it. A bunch of the folk involved, like Armistad and Novak, were old hands by then, in the game of diffuse misdirection. We might have gotten somewhere anyway, if Congress had not allowed the Watergate-era Special Prosecutor law to lapse, in the wake of Starr's interminable silly investigations of Clinton -- another Republican two-for-one: they got to screech constantly about Clinton and they demolished political support for the Special Prosecutor law
It's worth thinking about, but it has little to do with Snowden
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Which is convenient for the Conservatives, that's what they want. So they insert these tools into public agencies to sabotage them instead of manage them, and then say the agency is bad.
Consider the Post Office ...