The war is with China, the battleground Africa
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/NA13Ad02.htmlWhen United States President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta appeared together at the press conference at the Pentagon recently to reiterate Americas commitment to the Asia-Pacific region, the subject of Africa did not come up. Sometimes what is avoided can be a clue to what is most important on the agenda.
The obvious intent of the stated focus on the Asia-Pacific region is
to remind the rising China that America is still the big dog. Recent arms sales to Taiwan and the agreement with Australia to station American troops there are but two symbolic gestures to that effect. But the real focus of the "focus on Asia-Pacific" is not the Asia-Pacific region at all. It is Africa.
The creation of Africom in 2006 by the US military was a signal that America would not simply lie back and allow the Chinese to become the hegemon for the continent. That signal by itself was not enough, however. By 2009 Chinese trade with Africa surpassed Americas for the first time.
Chinese economic involvement took many forms. Obviously resource development is a priority for the Chinese, as Africa is acknowledged to be the worlds greatest storehouse of precious and rare metals and has vast unexploited oil reserves. While Chinese companies, all proxies for the government of China, compete with western companies for those resources, they also enter into agreements to provide critical infrastructure in the transportation, education and medical fields, all of which provide an advantage when it comes to winning hearts and minds.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Even though we can no longer import slaves (I'm sure some rethugs would love to overturn that), there's still plenty of oil and other natural resources to be pillaged.
Just think, some day we may even be able to move our manufacturing plants from low-cost China to even-lower-cost Africa. I for one am looking forward to buying dirt-cheap crap from Walmart with the "Made in Sierra Leone" label.
Response to xchrom (Original post)
Post removed
Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)Thanks for the thread, xchrom.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Some articles I've read recently.
It is absolutely right for China to stick to the path of peaceful development. Meanwhile, however, we should still keep a cool and watchful mind when dealing with international affairs.
...
As summarized in 1986 by Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US national security advisor, the national interest of the US lies in three fronts. The first is the far west where Eastern Europe is the focal point. The second is the far east, where conflicts are centered in countries such as Japan, China and North Korea, and key points of interest lie in South Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan Island. The third lies in the southwest, where the strategic focuses of the US are Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan.
Today, the US has been carrying out strategies on all the three fronts. It has further squeezed Russia's space through NATO expansion. The "return to Asia" has stirred up huge waves of tension around China.
In the Islamic world, the US has brought down Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and Yemen. Now it is pressuring Syria and Iran, as well as Pakistan.
...
http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/691787/Global-conflict-simmers-despite-lack-of-open-war.aspx
The US Plan to Destabilize Sudan
by THOMAS C. MOUNTAIN
As South Sudan implodes in a growing mass insanity of ethnic violence and once again tens of thousands have to flee for their lives the warning signs all point towards the US plan to destabilize Sudan having begun to hit its stride.
To start with, the US pays the salaries for the Sudan Peoples Liberation Army (SPLA, the national army of South Sudan), over $100 million in 2011 alone. Does a country really have independence when a foreign power pays its armys salaries? Whose orders is the army really going to follow?
Today, thousands of UN peacekeepers are pouring into South Sudan. These peacekeepers are almost entirely from next door Ethiopia and are part of an Ethiopian military carrying out a counterinsurgency/genocide in the Ogaden in south east Ethiopia.
An Ethiopian military that has repeatedly invaded Somali acting under orders from the USA. The same Ethiopian army that six years earlier invaded Eritrea. Peacekeepers indeed.
The Ethiopian peacekeepers salaries, all their expenses actually, are being paid for by Uncle Sam.
..
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/10/the-us-plan-to-destabilize-sudan/
bonzotex
(865 posts)This article at the link is not exactly chock-full of insight or data. I think it is a fascinating topic, but this article doesn't really say much.
The author:
"Dieter Neumann's blog "the view from Falling Downs" is just chock-full of witty takes on the end of the world and also has informative articles on chainsaws and dogs."
TigerToMany
(124 posts)If their 60-year long misadventure in the brutally-occupied nation of Tibet taught us anything it is that China will be just as brutal as the US, France, and England were in Africa.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)And then we have the nerve to tell China "No, you can not build roads, schools and other infrastructure projects, because that might interfere with the world's longest running war."
Shame on us.