Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 04:06 PM Oct 2013

Pregnant Woman Forced Into Drug-Treatment Program Despite Being Drug-Free. Only Her Fetus Got a Lawy

Pregnant Woman Forced Into Drug-Treatment Program Despite Being Drug-Free. Only Her Fetus Got a Lawyer.

By Amanda Marcotte

While the United States hasn't yet devolved to throwing women in jail for miscarrying like El Salvador has, the anti-abortion movement's attempt to criminalize pregnancy with "fetal endangerment" laws is already leading to arrests here at home. The New York Times reported this week on a federal lawsuit, the first of its kind, filed against Wisconsin on behalf of 28-year-old Alicia Beltran, challenging a 1998 law that allows the police to detain a pregnant woman suspected of using illegal drugs or alcohol and who refuses treatment. The lawyers arguing Beltran's case say that the law violates constitutional rights such as due process and the right to medical privacy.

They couldn't have asked for a better plaintiff, particularly to argue that these laws are applied selectively, often based less on actual drug use and more on doctor and police prejudices against women of color, single mothers, and the working poor. Reports the Times:


She was 14 weeks pregnant and thought she had done the right thing when, at a prenatal checkup, she described a pill addiction the previous year and said she had ended it on her own — something later verified by a urine test. But now an apparently skeptical doctor and a social worker accused her of endangering her unborn child because she had refused to accept their order to start on an anti-addiction drug.

Ms. Beltran, 28, was taken in shackles before a family court commissioner who, she says, brushed aside her pleas for a lawyer. To her astonishment, the court had already appointed a legal guardian for the fetus.

More:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/10/25/alicia_beltran_pregnant_and_drug_free_was_forced_into_a_drug_treatment_program.html
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pregnant Woman Forced Into Drug-Treatment Program Despite Being Drug-Free. Only Her Fetus Got a Lawy (Original Post) Judi Lynn Oct 2013 OP
Are "anti-addiction drugs" addictive? Any side-effects, big pharma? tridim Oct 2013 #1
Methadone? Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #2
Suboxone Downwinder Oct 2013 #6
This is so wrong get the red out Oct 2013 #3
That's the right wing way---no civil rights or due process for any woman Warpy Oct 2013 #4
Your totally right coachdeviepnl Oct 2013 #5
welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #8
So they gave her the name "Offred" and all rejoiced at Fred's fecundity. Squinch Oct 2013 #7
+1 bemildred Oct 2013 #10
I love her inordinately. Squinch Oct 2013 #13
Very fond of her myself. bemildred Oct 2013 #14
I hope she sues these morons for their back teeth and wins. nt bemildred Oct 2013 #9
goddammit I'm sick of the "women are vessels with no right to life" attitude. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2013 #11
and it's popping up everywhere awoke_in_2003 Oct 2013 #12
From the package insert for suboxone... jmowreader Oct 2013 #15

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
3. This is so wrong
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 04:32 PM
Oct 2013

She was already recovering and in compliance. This was bullying, letting her know that she did not matter one bit as a human being and there was no way she could prove to the great POWERS THAT BE that she worthy of the child she carried. It shows how she was considered much less than human by the fetus getting a lawyer before she received one.

Plus they are idiots, they are putting all this stress on this pregnant lady acting like that in itself can't have a negative effect on her child.

She was honest with the doctors and they were like sharks smelling blood in the water, "we can nail this bitch" is what I imagine was going through their grandiose heads.

Warpy

(111,266 posts)
4. That's the right wing way---no civil rights or due process for any woman
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 04:46 PM
Oct 2013

who has even the slightest chance of being pregnant. Even here on DU, people think bartenders have the right to refuse a pregnant woman a single glass of wine, something doctors agree isn't harmful.

I hope the ACLU takes this case.

Squinch

(50,950 posts)
7. So they gave her the name "Offred" and all rejoiced at Fred's fecundity.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 07:20 PM
Oct 2013

(If you haven't read A Handmaid's Tale, you should go out right now and get a copy, because it's becoming less a science fiction tale, and more a prediction.)

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
10. +1
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 05:54 AM
Oct 2013
And she also includes, in an appendix, her letter to a school district board in San Antonio after it banned her novel "The Handmaid's Tale" (a decision since reversed) for its strong sexual content. "I would like to thank those who have dedicated themselves so energetically to the banning of my novel," she begins. "It's encouraging to know that the written word is still taken so seriously."

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
11. goddammit I'm sick of the "women are vessels with no right to life" attitude.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 11:30 AM
Oct 2013

Yeah, I used that phrase on purpose.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
15. From the package insert for suboxone...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 03:03 AM
Oct 2013

"There are no adequate and well-controlle studies of SUBOXONE or SUBUTEX in pregnant women. SUBOXONE or SUBUTEX should only be used during pregnancy if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus."

(http://www.naabt.org/documents/packageinsert.pdf)

So let me see...if Alicia Beltran would have taken this drug she did not need and miscarried, or delivered a baby with severe birth defects, and it could have been connected to this drug they forced her on, how many millions of dollars would the taxpayers of Wisconsin be out?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Pregnant Woman Forced Int...