Pregnant Woman Forced Into Drug-Treatment Program Despite Being Drug-Free. Only Her Fetus Got a Lawy
Pregnant Woman Forced Into Drug-Treatment Program Despite Being Drug-Free. Only Her Fetus Got a Lawyer.
By Amanda Marcotte
While the United States hasn't yet devolved to throwing women in jail for miscarrying like El Salvador has, the anti-abortion movement's attempt to criminalize pregnancy with "fetal endangerment" laws is already leading to arrests here at home. The New York Times reported this week on a federal lawsuit, the first of its kind, filed against Wisconsin on behalf of 28-year-old Alicia Beltran, challenging a 1998 law that allows the police to detain a pregnant woman suspected of using illegal drugs or alcohol and who refuses treatment. The lawyers arguing Beltran's case say that the law violates constitutional rights such as due process and the right to medical privacy.
They couldn't have asked for a better plaintiff, particularly to argue that these laws are applied selectively, often based less on actual drug use and more on doctor and police prejudices against women of color, single mothers, and the working poor. Reports the Times:
She was 14 weeks pregnant and thought she had done the right thing when, at a prenatal checkup, she described a pill addiction the previous year and said she had ended it on her own something later verified by a urine test. But now an apparently skeptical doctor and a social worker accused her of endangering her unborn child because she had refused to accept their order to start on an anti-addiction drug.
Ms. Beltran, 28, was taken in shackles before a family court commissioner who, she says, brushed aside her pleas for a lawyer. To her astonishment, the court had already appointed a legal guardian for the fetus.
More:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/10/25/alicia_beltran_pregnant_and_drug_free_was_forced_into_a_drug_treatment_program.html
tridim
(45,358 posts)SMH at this whole story.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Naltrexone?
Nothing that would be good for a fetus, I'd think.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)From the OP
get the red out
(13,466 posts)She was already recovering and in compliance. This was bullying, letting her know that she did not matter one bit as a human being and there was no way she could prove to the great POWERS THAT BE that she worthy of the child she carried. It shows how she was considered much less than human by the fetus getting a lawyer before she received one.
Plus they are idiots, they are putting all this stress on this pregnant lady acting like that in itself can't have a negative effect on her child.
She was honest with the doctors and they were like sharks smelling blood in the water, "we can nail this bitch" is what I imagine was going through their grandiose heads.
Warpy
(111,266 posts)who has even the slightest chance of being pregnant. Even here on DU, people think bartenders have the right to refuse a pregnant woman a single glass of wine, something doctors agree isn't harmful.
I hope the ACLU takes this case.
coachdeviepnl
(1 post)this would definitely be a job for the ACLU!
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)(If you haven't read A Handmaid's Tale, you should go out right now and get a copy, because it's becoming less a science fiction tale, and more a prediction.)
Squinch
(50,950 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Yeah, I used that phrase on purpose.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)It is like most of the world is racing back to the dark ages
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)"There are no adequate and well-controlle studies of SUBOXONE or SUBUTEX in pregnant women. SUBOXONE or SUBUTEX should only be used during pregnancy if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus."
(http://www.naabt.org/documents/packageinsert.pdf)
So let me see...if Alicia Beltran would have taken this drug she did not need and miscarried, or delivered a baby with severe birth defects, and it could have been connected to this drug they forced her on, how many millions of dollars would the taxpayers of Wisconsin be out?