Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BridgeTheGap

(3,615 posts)
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 01:27 PM Jan 2014

Laughing Into Darkness - Why no Mark Twain for our 2nd Gilded Age?

Twain for as long as I’ve known him has been true to his word, and so I’m careful never to find myself too far out of his reach. The Library of America volumes of his Collected Tales, Sketches, Speeches, and Essays (1852–1910) stand behind my desk on a shelf with the dictionaries and the atlas. On days when the news both foreign and domestic is moving briskly from bad to worse, I look to one or another of Twain’s jests to spring the trap or lower a rope, to summon, as he is in the habit of doing, a blast of laughter to blow away the “peacock shams” of the world’s “colossal humbug.”

Laughter was Twain’s stock in trade, and for 30 years as bestselling author and star attraction on America’s late-nineteenth-century lecture stage, he produced it in sufficient quantity to make bearable the acquaintance with grief that he knew to be generously distributed among all present in the Boston Lyceum or a Tennessee saloon, in a Newport drawing room as in a Nevada brothel. Whether the audience was sober or drunk, topped with top hats or snared in snakebitten boots, Twain understood it likely in need of a remedy to cover its losses.

No other writer of his generation had seen as much of the young nation’s early sorrow, or become as familiar with its commonplace scenes of human depravity and squalor. As a boy on the Missouri frontier in the 1830s he attended the flogging and lynching of fugitive slaves; in the California gold fields in the 1860s he kept company with underage murderers and overage whores; in New York City in the 1870s he supped at the Gilded Age banquets of financial swindle and political fraud, learning from his travels that “the hard and sordid things of life are too hard and too sordid and too cruel for us to know and touch them year after year without some mitigating influence.” Twain bottled the influence under whatever label drummed up a crowd -- as comedy, burlesque, satire, parody, sarcasm, ridicule, wit -- any or all of it presented as “the solid nonpareil,” guaranteed to fortify the blood and restore the spirit. Humor for Twain was the hero with a thousand faces.

With Groucho Marx I share the opinion that comedians “are a much rarer and far more valuable commodity than all the gold and precious stones in the world,” but the assaying of that commodity -- of what does it consist in its coats of many colors, among them cocksure pink, shithouse brown, and dead-end black -- is a question that I gladly leave to the French philosopher Henri Bergson, Twain’s contemporary who in 1900 took note of its primary components: “The comic does not exist outside the pale of what is strictly human... Laughter has no greater foe than emotion... Its appeal is to the intelligence, pure and simple... Our laughter is always the laughter of a group.”

Read more: http://www.utne.com/mind-body/laughing-into-darkness.aspx#ixzz2pMDsWp4Y

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Laughing Into Darkness - Why no Mark Twain for our 2nd Gilded Age? (Original Post) BridgeTheGap Jan 2014 OP
Stephen Colbert is the closest we have. . . Journeyman Jan 2014 #1
Vonnegut saw what GE, pollution, and boobish consumerism would lead to: MisterP Jan 2014 #2
what a great article. thanks for posting. recommended. bookmarked Bill USA Jan 2014 #3
I would put Carlin up there. nt flying rabbit Jan 2014 #4
We had George Carlin for two generations and failed to heed. TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #5

Journeyman

(15,034 posts)
1. Stephen Colbert is the closest we have. . .
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 02:52 PM
Jan 2014

Who among us who saw him eviscerate George W. at the 2006 Correspondents' Dinner didn't realize that the Emperor & His Court Reporters had been exposed as not only clothes-less but clueless as well. It was a skewering worthy of Twain.

I only wish Colbert would dabble more often in more permanent media, in the written word, that his genius would be more accessible to future generations.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
2. Vonnegut saw what GE, pollution, and boobish consumerism would lead to:
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jan 2014

the galloping schizophrenia he had to fight with every day

(besides, "Galápagos" beats "Connecticut Yankee" any day *runs*)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Laughing Into Darkness - ...