Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 09:27 AM Feb 2014

As Services Expand, Cable Bills Keep Rising

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/15/business/media/as-services-expand-cable-bills-keep-rising.html

As Services Expand, Cable Bills Keep Rising
By EDWARD WYATT | FEB. 14, 2014

WASHINGTON — Of the many benefits that Comcast executives said would flow to consumers from its proposed $45 billion takeover of Time Warner Cable — more innovation, advanced technology, improved service — the one it did not mention is probably the one consumers care about most: their cable bills.

“We’re certainly not promising that customer bills are going to go down or even that they’re going to increase less rapidly,” David L. Cohen, a Comcast executive vice president, said Thursday in a conference call with reporters.

Wittingly or not, it was a blunt acknowledgment of a trend that has been consistent throughout the history of cable business consolidation: Prices go up, not down.

According to statistics collected annually by the Federal Communications Commission, the price paid by consumers for expanded basic cable service has grown at more than twice the rate of inflation annually over the last 17 years. Cable companies say that is because they are offering more services in each package, which causes the overall price to rise. The per-channel price, they argue, has declined.




8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Services Expand, Cable Bills Keep Rising (Original Post) jsr Feb 2014 OP
The per channel price down? clydefrand Feb 2014 #1
Nationalize Communications. nt onehandle Feb 2014 #2
Will they have more bearded, bigoted White Men programs to watch on prime time? katmondoo Feb 2014 #3
I still would... GTurck Feb 2014 #4
Make your own Attenna, try it before you tell them to stuff it! Herself Feb 2014 #5
Sorry Her, that might be an option for someone on the flatlands tech3149 Feb 2014 #7
did you try connecting the antenna's ? Herself Feb 2014 #8
"They" have us believing fredamae Feb 2014 #6

clydefrand

(4,325 posts)
1. The per channel price down?
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 09:32 AM
Feb 2014

sure we got lots of Encore channels that are totally unviewable due to poor quality, more channels that we NEVER watch, etc. Take all the JUNK channels off and see how much the PER CHANNEL COST WOULD BE.

katmondoo

(6,457 posts)
3. Will they have more bearded, bigoted White Men programs to watch on prime time?
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 09:47 AM
Feb 2014

Maybe more naked people in the jungle, more fast cars, such an endless group of nothingness that will surface with higher prices. How lucky they are.

GTurck

(826 posts)
4. I still would...
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 09:51 AM
Feb 2014

prefer al a carte station choices and be charged on those I really will watch. The Comcast/Time-Warner merger is sure to be another nail in the coffin of that desire. There is no creativity or vision in American business only more and more bottom line strategies.

Herself

(185 posts)
5. Make your own Attenna, try it before you tell them to stuff it!
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 09:59 AM
Feb 2014

check mechanic's illustrated for designs.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
7. Sorry Her, that might be an option for someone on the flatlands
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 11:23 AM
Feb 2014

Those of us in the hills are totally screwed.

The change to digital broadcast TV had most stations move to UHF. Since I worked in electronics my whole life, I knew it would be a problem.
There is no way that coverage to anything but urban or flatland areas is even possible.
The broadcasters knew this, that's why they set up satellite transmitter sites to try and fill in the gaps.
Only problem is it just don't work!

I tried in vain to get away from cable for TV. I spent 6 months building EVERY variation of antenna. I could never get 1/4 of the local stations. I could get stations well out of my local area.
So I bought antennas that matched my best results.
Guess what? No better, worse than that, even worse.

No offense but your response to the OP is either of no value or harmful to those looking for an option to cable.

Herself

(185 posts)
8. did you try connecting the antenna's ?
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 12:00 PM
Feb 2014

I live between 2 mountains, I get plenty of channels, and was too lazy to put the antenna outside.

As far as being "harmful" that is merely your opinion.

Perhaps what is most harmful is the addiction to television?

btw, in the military I was in communications. Electronic's doesn't make a comm's expert.

Not looking for a conflict, but your tax dollars that train military personnel doesn't go "poof" when we get out!

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
6. "They" have us believing
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 10:43 AM
Feb 2014

"we" can't "live" without the Crap they sell us via these services?
Well, I've shut them off before and reconnected to family and friends-it's truly Amazing what you can think of to do without the constant yammering from talking heads, commentators, commercials enticing us to buy crap we don't need with money we don't have-not to mention the mindless reality shows and sit-coms---political influence begins to fade and one begins to "think" clearly...the Benefits go on and on...

The bottom line is-we are the consumers and If we collectively don't like what they're doing/selling? Don't buy it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»As Services Expand, Cable...