Wage slavery and the ACA
Gil Smart at Smart Remarks:
As The New York Times reported, With the expansion of insurance coverage, the budget office predicted, more people will choose not to work, and others will choose to work fewer hours than they might have otherwise to obtain employer-provided insurance.
Wage slaves, in other words, may seek to throw off the yoke.
This set off the usual round of hand-wringing over the supposed demise of the Protestant work ethic. The ACA will subsidize sloth, goes this argument. That Obamacare may allow families to decide how they will work or if they will work will be emblazoned on the tombstone of liberalism, predicted conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer.
And if America was awash in good jobs but people preferred to slack, I might agree with him.
But youll notice were not awash in good jobs. We may never be awash in them again.
Wal-Mart is the countrys biggest employer. The second-biggest is a temp agency, Kelly Services. To this, the workforce is supposed to aspire?
If the Protestant work ethic is dying, might it be because theres less and less for people to work for?
What sort of future does the modern American wage slave have to look forward to? Rising wages and better benefits? Or will they continue to lose ground? After all, theres a huge glut of available labor out there, and that can only force wages down. The only product produced by the majority of people, their labor, has fallen in value.
And yet, these devalued human beings are supposed to see some sort of nobility in low-wage work and dead-end jobs? How can we expect and how can we demand that anyone be satisfied with that?
If the Protestant work ethic is dying, lets place the blame where it belongs: not with Obamacare, but with an economy that needs American workers less, and thus can pay them less. Because working when there seems to be less and less to work for looks a lot like servitude. And we shouldnt be surprised if the people stuck in that dead end are indeed interested in a way out.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Exactly, the ACA is a republican invention.
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 17, 2014, 05:34 AM - Edit history (1)
"free market forces" when labor supply and wages start to favor
the worker ?
People are retiring or semi-retiring, which they deserved to do years
ago, because they have been set free from the shackles of employment-
based health insurance (and their IRAs/401Ks have recouped losses)
People now have the OPTION to stop working for the Money Barons,
as stated in the OP.
If employers wanted to RETAIN their employees, they could try using
incentives -- like better wages and other benefits -- instead of exploiting
them in their economic desperation.
There are millions of unemployed people who would be eager to fill
these openings, provided they aren't the no-hope-for-advancement,
forced-servitude situation that their predecessors had to endure:
subsistence level, hand-to-mouth, exploited, shit work.
In the end, what will shut up these doomsayers is the lowering of the
unemployment rate (below 7%) which will hopefully happen as a result.
Raising minimum wage is the next big step.