Zimmerman, Dunn and what went horribly wrong: Author Lisa Bloom talks to Salon
From implicit racial bias to "stand your ground," Lisa Bloom says dangerous forces are distorting criminal justicePAUL ROSENBERG
With the recent second anniversary of Trayvon Martins death, legal analyst Lisa Bloom released a new book on the rash of shootings of black teens, Suspicion Nation: The Inside Story of the Trayvon Martin Injustice and Why We Continue to Repeat It. In addition to thoroughly re-analyzing the case and the trial in Part 1 of the book, answering questions about the case you didnt even know you had, she devotes three chapters in Part 2 to underlying factors responsible for the repetition: implicit racial bias, Americas armed-to-the-teeth gun culture, and stand your ground laws.
Implicit racial bias refers to biases we arent even aware of having, but which researchers since the 1990s have become increasingly skilled at detecting and analyzing. Blooms analysis, however, focuses particularly on how these invisible forces often directly at odds with our conscious intentions interact with all-too-solid, virtually immovable institutional structures, such as education and the law. In hindsight, Blooms book helps us recognize how the effects of these interactions profoundly shaped, and ultimately deeply distorted, the course of events, from those leading up to Trayvons murder, to those that transpired in the trial and its aftermath.
Salon recently spoke with Bloom; a condensed version of our interview follows.
Lets begin with why you wrote Suspicion Nation. Books about major crime trials are a major sub-genre unto themselves, but this didnt strike me as your typical example of that sub-genre, so, what was your motivation for writing it?
Ill take that as a compliment, thank you. Im not really a crime genre writer/person either. Im a legal analyst and Ive covered every major crime story and legal story in America about the last 18 years. And its typically gone that Ive covered the story oftentimes its a very emotionally compelling case and then its over and I move on to the next one, moved though I was by the case. In this one, I was not able to move on, and a few months after the trial was over I just was very disturbed by what I saw. But I wasnt completely sure that the case was such an injustice. I had the sense that it was, but I couldnt be sure.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/06/zimmerman_dunn_and_what_went_horribly_wrong_legal_analyst_lisa_bloom_talks_to_salon/
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I know the simple answer -- bigotry, gun nuttery, Florida's lax gun and self-defense laws written by the gun lobby, etc. But, there were 6 people on that jury. Not one had the guts to stand their ground and do the right thing.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)amandabeech
(9,893 posts)did not come across well on the stand, and I think that part of the problem was that the prosecutors did not prepare those witnesses thoroughly.
The prosecutors seemed to think that emotions alone would get them the verdict they wanted. Their closing arguments were virtually devoid of facts, and nowadays juries used to watching crime shows on TV want to see those forensic facts or they won't convict.
At least that's how my lawyer's eyes saw it.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)The prosecution IMO over-charged with trying to get him on Murder 2. Not to mention the prosecution witnesses were terrible on the stand as you pointed out.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)defense attorney doing the commentary. I thought that MSNBC's commentator was too wedded to her own theories to provide an even-handed analysis of the actual trial.
Anyway, after the prosecution's case, the former prosecutor, who had really been rooting for them, said, "Well, they sorta proved it." The defense attorney pointed out that the standard was "beyond a reasonable doubt."
At the end of the case, the defense attorney said that the prosecutors, against whom he had represented many defendants in Jacksonville, habitually over-charged defendants, particularly minority male defendants, in order to try to get them to plead guilty to ridiculously long sentences. The guy was incensed, and rightfully so.
Anyway, that same defense attorney is now defending Alan Grayson in his divorce case. Alan will be well represented, and if he should take the stand, he will be well prepared.
trublu992
(489 posts)the complications of how these unjust verdicts get handed down. She also explain the complexities of race and how Black boys/men/ people are perceived by juries and law enforcement.