Ukraine crisis upends West's view of Russian President Vladimir Putin
WASHINGTON The Ukraine crisis has forced Western leaders to reassess what they thought they knew about Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has shown that he is willing to make far riskier moves to achieve his security goals and that his hostility to the U.S. and its allies runs much deeper than many wanted to believe.
That reappraisal has caused U.S. national security officials to take Putin more seriously as a threat. The possibility that he might also send troops into eastern Ukraine, which could spark a war, or that he might use force against other neighboring countries, including the Baltic nations, no longer seems as unlikely as the foreign policy establishment thought.
"We're seeing that he has the ability and will do things that
we were sure they wouldn't do," said Eugene Rumer, a Russia specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "We are being forced by events to reappraise Putin, Russia policy and our relationship."
Putin alarmed Western governments in 2008 when his troops and tanks moved into two pro-Russia breakaway regions of Georgia to stop a military advance by the central government. But his use of troops to seize control of Ukraine's Crimean peninsula without any provocation is a far more ominous threat, breaking more international norms and involving a nation that is far more consequential to the security of Europe, officials and analysts say.
http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-ukraine-putin-20140307,0,2724923.story
Pitiful. That's the only word that comes to mind. And "cognitive disconnect".
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)A Pentagon research team is studying the body movements of Russian President Vladimir Putin and other world leaders in order to better predict their actions and guide U.S. policy, Pentagon documents and interviews show.
The "Body Leads" project backed by the Office of Net Assessment (ONA), the think tank reporting to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, uses the principles of movement pattern analysis to predict how leaders will act.
U.S. policymakers are seeking any advantage they can find as they try to anticipate Putin, who in the past week has ordered Russian troops into neighboring Ukraine and laid claim to the Crimea Peninsula. The ensuing crisis has led to U.S. and European sanctions against Russia, spurred weapons and aircraft shipments to Eastern European nations and revived tensions last seen during the height of the Cold War.
ONA has backed the work of Brenda Connors, the director of Body Leads and a research fellow at the Naval War College in Newport, R.I., since 1996, records show, and has paid about $300,000 since 2009 to outside experts to work with her. Part of her work includes a 2008 report for ONA on Putin called "Movement, The Brain and Decision-making, the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/06/pentagon-studying-putins-body-movement-for-clues/6116281/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)they're ADORABLE
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Any good actor, and any reasonably intelligent 15-year old is a good enough actor, will hand this system it's ass, if he knows he is being watched, and maybe even if he doesn't know, some people are always dissembling when in public.
And any good politician will use it against them. Guys like Putin will have them screwing themselves before they know it.
And they don't listen. They think they already know everything, so they are incapable of learning. They latch onto one piece of technical voodoo after another.
And that's not even getting into the "errors".
MisterP
(23,730 posts)anyone who *knew* anything about the regions in question was replaced with more fanatical and obedient types who'd Get the Job Done; the Pentagon and then even the CIA got sidestepped
Jeane Kirkpatrick said any local factors were neither important nor pertinent: the Latin American masses were incapable of becoming historical actors, currently trapped in an evolutionary "stage" of mere survival--so any unrest couldn't be a sign of popular discontent! those affected by a policy were the last people one should listen to
popular support for a rebellion, even under risk of death, was quite unthinkable, and nationalism or poverty were ignored; nothing was considered on its own terms--"the Soviet Union underlies all the unrest that is going on. If they werent engaged in this game of dominoes, there wouldnt be any hot spots in the world"
any Third-World assertiveness was obviously a sign of Soviet advance; guerrillas, labor strikes, terrorism, drug trafficking, political dissension, peasant organization, Catholic Liberation Theology, and media criticism of U.S. foreign policy were all part of a coordinated global attack on U.S. values and security--on everything we are and stand for
Accuracy in Media claimed that Marxists control the U.S.s media and universities and said John Lantigua got "live-in female Sandinista sex slaves in exchange for penning Sandinista agitprop"; US editors especially agreed that disinformation specialists in Managua controlled the U.S. news and were behind any bad press; it's a well-orchestrated effort by a worldwide communist network that was controlling human-rights groups, the Catholic Church, and former Salvadoran officers
fortunately Reagan said that Roger Staubach would drive out any Nicaraguans taking Mexico and Texas
Igel
(35,309 posts)When people say, "We are the world" they really sometimes seem to confuse that with "everybody's just like us."
College-educated Europeans and Americans are not the world. The world keeps pointing this out in very clear terms, but somehow the college-educated Europeans and Americans keep missing the obvious in socially constructing their own reality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community
That just encapsulates it for me.